Literature DB >> 24798084

Dynamic visual tests to identify and quantify visual damage and repair following demyelination in optic neuritis patients.

Noa Raz1, Michal Hallak1, Tamir Ben-Hur1, Netta Levin2.   

Abstract

In order to follow optic neuritis patients and evaluate the effectiveness of their treatment, a handy, accurate and quantifiable tool is required to assess changes in myelination at the central nervous system (CNS). However, standard measurements, including routine visual tests and MRI scans, are not sensitive enough for this purpose. We present two visual tests addressing dynamic monocular and binocular functions which may closely associate with the extent of myelination along visual pathways. These include Object From Motion (OFM) extraction and Time-constrained stereo protocols. In the OFM test, an array of dots compose an object, by moving the dots within the image rightward while moving the dots outside the image leftward or vice versa. The dot pattern generates a camouflaged object that cannot be detected when the dots are stationary or moving as a whole. Importantly, object recognition is critically dependent on motion perception. In the Time-constrained Stereo protocol, spatially disparate images are presented for a limited length of time, challenging binocular 3-dimensional integration in time. Both tests are appropriate for clinical usage and provide a simple, yet powerful, way to identify and quantify processes of demyelination and remyelination along visual pathways. These protocols may be efficient to diagnose and follow optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis patients. In the diagnostic process, these protocols may reveal visual deficits that cannot be identified via current standard visual measurements. Moreover, these protocols sensitively identify the basis of the currently unexplained continued visual complaints of patients following recovery of visual acuity. In the longitudinal follow up course, the protocols can be used as a sensitive marker of demyelinating and remyelinating processes along time. These protocols may therefore be used to evaluate the efficacy of current and evolving therapeutic strategies, targeting myelination of the CNS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24798084      PMCID: PMC4168837          DOI: 10.3791/51107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  23 in total

1.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Markus Bock; Alexander Ulrich Brandt; Jan Dörr; Caspar F Pfueller; Stephanie Ohlraun; Frauke Zipp; Friedemann Paul
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Ganglion cell loss in relation to visual disability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Scott D Walter; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Kristin M Galetta; Reiko E Sakai; Daniel J Feller; Sam B Henderson; James A Wilson; Maureen G Maguire; Steven L Galetta; Elliot Frohman; Peter A Calabresi; Joel S Schuman; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Authors:  Shiv Saidha; Stephanie B Syc; Mary K Durbin; Christopher Eckstein; Jonathan D Oakley; Scott A Meyer; Amy Conger; Teresa C Frohman; Scott Newsome; John N Ratchford; Elliot M Frohman; Peter A Calabresi
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 5.  Signals to promote myelin formation and repair.

Authors:  Carla Taveggia; Maria Laura Feltri; Lawrence Wrabetz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thinning in clinically isolated syndrome.

Authors:  Timm Oberwahrenbrock; Marius Ringelstein; Simon Jentschke; Katrin Deuschle; Katharina Klumbies; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Jens Harmel; Klemens Ruprecht; Sven Schippling; Hans-Peter Hartung; Orhan Aktas; Alexander U Brandt; Friedemann Paul
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Tracking retinal nerve fiber layer loss after optic neuritis: a prospective study using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  F Costello; W Hodge; Y I Pan; E Eggenberger; S Coupland; R H Kardon
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 8.  Neurophysiological evidence for long-term repair of MS lesions: implications for axon protection.

Authors:  Steve J Jones; Adriana Brusa
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Association of retinal and macular damage with brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jan Dörr; Klaus D Wernecke; Markus Bock; Gunnar Gaede; Jens T Wuerfel; Caspar F Pfueller; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Alina Freing; Alexander U Brandt; Paul Friedemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Management of acute optic neuritis.

Authors:  S J Hickman; C M Dalton; D H Miller; G T Plant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Acute optic neuritis: Unmet clinical needs and model for new therapies.

Authors:  Steven L Galetta; Pablo Villoslada; Netta Levin; Kenneth Shindler; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Edward Parr; Diego Cadavid; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2015-07-23

2.  Visual pathway neurodegeneration winged by mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors:  Axel Petzold; Philip G Nijland; Lisanne J Balk; Angela Maria Amorini; Giacomo Lazzarino; Mike P Wattjes; Claudio Gasperini; Paul van der Valk; Barbara Tavazzi; Giuseppe Lazzarino; Jack van Horssen
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.511

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.