Literature DB >> 24797885

Proton therapy in adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer: planning comparison with advanced x-ray therapy and feasibility report.

Francesco Dionisi1, Stephen Avery, John N Lukens, Xuanfeng Ding, John Kralik, Maura Kirk, Robert E Roses, Maurizio Amichetti, James M Metz, John P Plastaras.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves both overall- and relapse-free survival in patients with resected gastric cancer. However, this comes at the cost of increased treatment-related toxicity. Proton therapy (PT) has distinct dosimetric characteristics that may reduce dose to normal tissues, improving the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this treatment planning study is to compare PT and intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) in gastric cancer with regards to normal tissue sparing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patient population consisted of resected gastric cancer patients treated at a single institution between 2008 and 2013. Patients who had undergone 4D CT simulation were replanned to the originally delivered doses (45-54 Gy in 25-30 daily fractions) using six-field photon IMXT and 2-3-field PT (double scattering-uniform scanning techniques).
RESULTS: Thirteen patients were eligible for the planning comparison. IMXT provided slightly higher homogeneity indices (median values 0.04 ± 0.01 vs. 0.07 ± 0.01, p = 0.03). PT resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) lower intermediate-low doses for all the normal tissues examined (small bowel V15 82 ml vs. 133 ml, liver mean doses Gy 11.9 vs. 14.4 Gy, left/right kidney mean doses 5/0.9 Gy vs. 7.8/3.1 Gy, heart mean doses 7.4 Gy vs. 9.5 Gy). The total energy deposited outside the target volume was significantly lower with PT (median integral dose 90.1 J vs. 129 J). Four patients were treated with PT: treatment was feasible and verifications scans showed that target coverage was robust.
CONCLUSION: PT can contribute to normal tissue sparing in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer, with a potential benefit in terms of compliance to treatment, acute and late toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24797885     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.912351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  6 in total

Review 1.  Proton beam therapy for gastrointestinal cancers: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Shahed N Badiyan; Christopher L Hallemeier; Steven H Lin; Matthew D Hall; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Proton Therapy in the Management of Luminal Gastrointestinal Cancers: Esophagus, Stomach, and Anorectum.

Authors:  Jana M Kobeissi; Charles B Simone; Lara Hilal; Abraham J Wu; Haibo Lin; Christopher H Crane; Carla Hajj
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Steven H Lin; Charles B Simone; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08

4.  Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes.

Authors:  John C Kralik; Liwen Xi; Timothy D Solberg; Charles B Simone; Liyong Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric carcinoma: State of the art and perspectives.

Authors:  A Schernberg; E Rivin Del Campo; B Rousseau; O Matzinger; M Loi; P Maingon; F Huguet
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-13

6.  Effect of alpha-lipoic acid on radiation-induced small intestine injury in mice.

Authors:  Bae Kwon Jeong; Jin Ho Song; Hojin Jeong; Hoon Sik Choi; Jung Hwa Jung; Jong Ryeal Hahm; Seung Hoon Woo; Myeong Hee Jung; Bong-Hoi Choi; Jin Hyun Kim; Ki Mun Kang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.