Literature DB >> 24797844

Assessment of virtual reality robotic simulation performance by urology resident trainees.

Raaj K Ruparel1, Abby S Taylor1, Janil Patel1, Vipul R Patel2, Michael G Heckman3, Bhupendra Rawal3, Raymond J Leveillee4, David D Thiel5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine resident performance on the Mimic dV-Trainer (MdVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) for correlation with resident trainee level (postgraduate year [PGY]), console experience (CE), and simulator exposure in their training program to assess for internal bias with the simulator.
DESIGN: Residents from programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Each resident was scored on 4 simulator tasks (peg board, camera targeting, energy dissection [ED], and needle targeting) with 3 different outcomes (final score, economy of motion score, and time to complete exercise) measured for each task. These scores were evaluated for association with PGY, CE, and simulator exposure.
SETTING: Robotic skills training laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 27 residents from 14 programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated.
RESULTS: Time to complete the ED exercise was significantly shorter for residents who had logged live robotic console compared with those who had not (p = 0.003). There were no other associations with live robotic console time that approached significance (all p ≥ 0.21). The only measure that was significantly associated with PGY was time to complete ED exercise (p = 0.009). No associations with previous utilization of a robotic simulator in the resident's home training program were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The ED exercise on the MdVT is most associated with CE and PGY compared with other exercises. Exposure of trainees to the MdVT in training programs does not appear to alter performance scores compared with trainees who do not have the simulator.
© 2013 Published by Association of Program Directors in Surgery on behalf of Association of Program Directors in Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Knowledge; Professionalism; resident training; robotic prostatectomy; robotic surgery; robotic training; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24797844     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  4 in total

1.  Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Martina Klein; Eric Schommer; David D Thiel; Srinivas Samavedi; Anup Kumar; Raymond J Leveillee; Raju Thomas; Julio M Pow-Sang; Li-Ming Su; Engy Mui; Roger Smith; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-01-11

2.  Impact of delay on telesurgical performance: study on the robotic simulator dV-Trainer.

Authors:  Manuela Perez; Song Xu; Sanket Chauhan; Alyssa Tanaka; Khara Simpson; Haidar Abdul-Muhsin; Roger Smith
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education - A review and expert commentary.

Authors:  David L Kok; Sathana Dushyanthen; Gabrielle Peters; Daniel Sapkaroski; Michelle Barrett; Jenny Sim; Jesper Grau Eriksen
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16

4.  Automatically rating trainee skill at a pediatric laparoscopic suturing task.

Authors:  Yousi A Oquendo; Elijah W Riddle; Dennis Hiller; Thane A Blinman; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.