UNLABELLED: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced endstage liver disease is currently a major indication for liver transplantation. After transplantation the donor liver inevitably becomes infected with the circulating virus. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the HCV coreceptor scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) inhibit HCV infection of different genotypes, both in cell culture and in humanized mice. Anti-SR-BI mAb therapy is successful even when initiated several days after HCV exposure, supporting its potential applicability to prevent HCV reinfection of liver allografts. However, HCV variants with reduced SR-BI dependency have been described in the literature, which could potentially limit the use of SR-BI targeting therapy. In this study we show, both in a preventative and postexposure setting, that humanized mice infected with HCV variants exhibiting increased in vitro resistance to SR-BI-targeting molecules remain responsive to anti-SR-BI mAb therapy in vivo. A 2-week antibody therapy readily cleared HCV RNA from the circulation of infected humanized mice. We found no evidence supporting increased SR-BI-receptor dependency of viral particles isolated from humanized mice compared to cell culture-produced virus. However, we observed that, unlike wild-type virus, the in vitro infectivity of the resistant variants was inhibited by both human high density lipoprotein (HDL) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL). The combination of mAb1671 with these lipoproteins further increased the antiviral effect. CONCLUSION: HCV variants that are less dependent on SR-BI in vitro can still be efficiently blocked by an anti-SR-BI mAb in humanized mice. Since these variants are also more susceptible to neutralization by anti-HCV envelope antibodies, their chance of emerging during anti-SR-BI therapy is severely reduced. Our data indicate that anti-SR-BI receptor therapy could be an effective way to prevent HCV infection in a liver transplant setting.
UNLABELLED: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced endstage liver disease is currently a major indication for liver transplantation. After transplantation the donor liver inevitably becomes infected with the circulating virus. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the HCV coreceptor scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) inhibit HCV infection of different genotypes, both in cell culture and in humanized mice. Anti-SR-BI mAb therapy is successful even when initiated several days after HCV exposure, supporting its potential applicability to prevent HCV reinfection of liver allografts. However, HCV variants with reduced SR-BI dependency have been described in the literature, which could potentially limit the use of SR-BI targeting therapy. In this study we show, both in a preventative and postexposure setting, that humanized mice infected with HCV variants exhibiting increased in vitro resistance to SR-BI-targeting molecules remain responsive to anti-SR-BI mAb therapy in vivo. A 2-week antibody therapy readily cleared HCV RNA from the circulation of infected humanized mice. We found no evidence supporting increased SR-BI-receptor dependency of viral particles isolated from humanized mice compared to cell culture-produced virus. However, we observed that, unlike wild-type virus, the in vitro infectivity of the resistant variants was inhibited by both human high density lipoprotein (HDL) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL). The combination of mAb1671 with these lipoproteins further increased the antiviral effect. CONCLUSION:HCV variants that are less dependent on SR-BI in vitro can still be efficiently blocked by an anti-SR-BI mAb in humanized mice. Since these variants are also more susceptible to neutralization by anti-HCV envelope antibodies, their chance of emerging during anti-SR-BI therapy is severely reduced. Our data indicate that anti-SR-BI receptor therapy could be an effective way to prevent HCV infection in a liver transplant setting.
Authors: Philip Meuleman; Jens Bukh; Lieven Verhoye; Ali Farhoudi; Thomas Vanwolleghem; Richard Y Wang; Isabelle Desombere; Harvey Alter; Robert H Purcell; Geert Leroux-Roels Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Laura Mensa; Gonzalo Crespo; Matthew J Gastinger; Juraj Kabat; Sofía Pérez-del-Pulgar; Rosa Miquel; Suzanne U Emerson; Robert H Purcell; Xavier Forns Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Gary L Davis; David R Nelson; Norah Terrault; Timothy L Pruett; Thomas D Schiano; Courtney V Fletcher; Christine V Sapan; Laura N Riser; Yufeng Li; Richard J Whitley; John W Gnann Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Joe Grove; Søren Nielsen; Jin Zhong; Margaret F Bassendine; Heidi E Drummer; Peter Balfe; Jane A McKeating Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Alexander Ploss; Matthew J Evans; Valeriya A Gaysinskaya; Maryline Panis; Hana You; Ype P de Jong; Charles M Rice Journal: Nature Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Shaoyong Li; Chen Ling; Li Zhong; Mengxin Li; Qin Su; Ran He; Qiushi Tang; Dale L Greiner; Leonard D Shultz; Michael A Brehm; Terence R Flotte; Christian Mueller; Arun Srivastava; Guangping Gao Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Nicole C Walsh; Laurie L Kenney; Sonal Jangalwe; Ken-Edwin Aryee; Dale L Greiner; Michael A Brehm; Leonard D Shultz Journal: Annu Rev Pathol Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 23.472