BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin is routinely used for the prevention of invasive bacterial infections during autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT). However, increasing rates of bacterial sepsis were noted at our institution among multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing outpatient APBSCT with melphalan-based chemotherapy and levofloxacin prophylaxis. We assessed the impact of a change in antibacterial prophylaxis from oral levofloxacin (Period 1) to sequential oral levofloxacin followed by ertapenem (Period 2). METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify MM patients who underwent APBSCT in the outpatient clinic between October 2007 and April 2012. RESULTS: Over a 4.5-year period, 165 outpatient APBSCTs were eligible for the analysis. Fewer overall bacteremias occurred during Period 2 as compared with Period 1 (0.5 cases per 100 person-days vs. 2.4 cases per 100 person-days, P<0.001). In addition, fewer patients were hospitalized for neutropenic fever while receiving sequential prophylaxis (45.7% vs. 75.7% of outpatient APBSCT recipients during Periods 2 and 1, respectively; P<0.001). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, receipt of sequential prophylaxis (Period 2) was significantly associated with overall bacteremia-free survival within 30 days after the APBSCT (P<0.001). No significant differences were seen in the number of patients developing Clostridium difficile infection or ertapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteremia between study periods. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, sequential prophylaxis may effectively prevent episodes of bacteremia and hospitalizations in neutropenic MM outpatient APBSCT recipients. Prospective studies that involve larger numbers of MM patients with extended periods of follow-up are ultimately required to define the safety and efficacy of sequential antibacterial prophylaxis.
BACKGROUND:Levofloxacin is routinely used for the prevention of invasive bacterial infections during autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT). However, increasing rates of bacterial sepsis were noted at our institution among multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing outpatientAPBSCT with melphalan-based chemotherapy and levofloxacin prophylaxis. We assessed the impact of a change in antibacterial prophylaxis from oral levofloxacin (Period 1) to sequential oral levofloxacin followed by ertapenem (Period 2). METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify MMpatients who underwent APBSCT in the outpatient clinic between October 2007 and April 2012. RESULTS: Over a 4.5-year period, 165 outpatient APBSCTs were eligible for the analysis. Fewer overall bacteremias occurred during Period 2 as compared with Period 1 (0.5 cases per 100 person-days vs. 2.4 cases per 100 person-days, P<0.001). In addition, fewer patients were hospitalized for neutropenic fever while receiving sequential prophylaxis (45.7% vs. 75.7% of outpatientAPBSCT recipients during Periods 2 and 1, respectively; P<0.001). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, receipt of sequential prophylaxis (Period 2) was significantly associated with overall bacteremia-free survival within 30 days after the APBSCT (P<0.001). No significant differences were seen in the number of patients developing Clostridium difficileinfection or ertapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteremia between study periods. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, sequential prophylaxis may effectively prevent episodes of bacteremia and hospitalizations in neutropenic MMoutpatientAPBSCT recipients. Prospective studies that involve larger numbers of MMpatients with extended periods of follow-up are ultimately required to define the safety and efficacy of sequential antibacterial prophylaxis.
Authors: Gonzalo Gutiérrez-García; Montserrat Rovira; Nacira Arab; Cristina Gallego; Joan Sánchez; María Ángeles Álvarez; Pilar Ayora; Ariadna Domenech; Nuria Borràs; Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato; Laura Rosiñol; Pedro Marín; Alexandra Pedraza; Alexandra Martínez-Roca; Esther Carcelero; María Dolores Herrera; María Teresa Solano; Carla Ramos; Noemí de Llobet; Anna Serrahima; Miquel Lozano; Joan Cid; Carmen Martínez; María Suárez-Lledó; Álvaro Urbano-Ispizua; Francesc Fernández-Avilés Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: T M Graff; A K Singavi; W Schmidt; D Eastwood; W R Drobyski; M Horowitz; J Palmer; M Pasquini; D J Rizzo; W Saber; P Hari; T S Fenske Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Katharina Lisenko; Sandra Sauer; Thomas Bruckner; Gerlinde Egerer; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jens Hillengass; Johann W Schmier; Sofia Shah; Mathias Witzens-Harig; Anthony D Ho; Patrick Wuchter Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 4.430