Literature DB >> 24797058

Comparison of flowrates and voided volumes during non-instrumented uroflowmetry and pressure-flow studies in women with stress incontinence.

Elizabeth R Mueller1,2, Heather Litman3, Leslie R Rickey4, Larry Sirls5, Peggy Norton6, Tracey Wilson7, Pamela Moalli8, Michael Albo9, Philippe Zimmern10.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Blaivas-Groutz nomogram defines voiding obstruction in women using Qmax from the NIF and the maximum detrusor pressure (Pdetmax ) from the PFS. The aim of this study was to understand the relationship between NIF and PFS maximum flow rates in women with stress incontinence.
METHODS: We analyzed the UDS of 597 women with stress-dominant urinary incontinence. Each subject underwent a NIF and then a PFS. Mixed model was used to test the hypothesis that the relationship between flow rates and voided volume (VV) were similar for NIF and PFS.
RESULTS: There were 452 subjects with both NIF and PFS studies that met the inclusion criteria and had max flow rate (Qmax ) for both NIF and PFS. The mean age was 53. Overall, higher VV were observed during PFS compared to NIF and subjects had higher Qmax with NIF compared to PFS. The relationship between Qmax and VV was significantly different between NIF and PFS (P < 0.004). At 200 ml, NIF Qmax was 14% higher than PFS Qmax and this difference increased to 30% at 700 ml.
CONCLUSION: The difference between PFS Qmax and NIF Qmax increases as VV increase. As a result, values from PFS and NIF cannot be used interchangeably as has been suggested in the Blaivas-Groutz nomogram for obstruction in women.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obstruction; pelvic organ prolapse; stress incontinence; urodynamics; uroflowmetry; women

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24797058      PMCID: PMC4219932          DOI: 10.1002/nau.22625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  18 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Urodynamic prolapse reduction alters urethral pressure but not filling or pressure flow parameters.

Authors:  E R Mueller; K Kenton; S Mahajan; M P FitzGerald; L Brubaker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; S Pushkin; D Blumenfeld; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Uroflowmetry in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  K W Coates; R L Harris; G W Cundiff; R C Bump
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-08

8.  Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations--the Liverpool nomograms.

Authors:  B T Haylen; D Ashby; J R Sutherst; M I Frazer; C R West
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1989-07

9.  Fluid weight uroflowmetry in women.

Authors:  J A Fantl; P J Smith; V Schneider; W G Hurt; L J Dunn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The correlation of voiding variables between non-instrumented uroflowmetery and pressure-flow studies in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mueller; John Wei; Ingrid Nygaard; Linda Brubaker; Ed Varner; Anthony Visco; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Chiara Ghetti; Karl Kreder
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  1 in total

1.  High urinary flow in women with stress incontinence: corrected flow-age nomogram evaluation after a transobturator tape procedure.

Authors:  Yasuhide Kitagawa; Kazutaka Narimoto; Satoko Urata; Shohei Kawaguchi; Masato Kuribayashi; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.