Literature DB >> 24796953

Limitations and recommendations for successful DNA extraction from forensic soil samples: a review.

Jennifer M Young1, Nicolas J Rawlence2, Laura S Weyrich2, Alan Cooper2.   

Abstract

Soil is commonly used in forensic casework to provide discriminatory power to link a suspect to a crime scene. Standard analyses examine the intrinsic properties of soils, including mineralogy, geophysics, texture and colour; however, soils can also support a vast amount of organisms, which can be examined using DNA fingerprinting techniques. Many previous genetic analyses have relied on patterns of fragment length variation produced by amplification of unidentified taxa in the soil extract. In contrast, the development of advanced DNA sequencing technologies now provides the ability to generate a detailed picture of soil microbial communities and the taxa present, allowing for improved discrimination between samples. However, DNA must be efficiently extracted from the complex soil matrix to achieve accurate and reproducible DNA sequencing results, and extraction efficacy is highly dependent on the soil type and method used. As a result, a consideration of soil properties is important when estimating the likelihood of successful DNA extraction. This would include a basic understanding of soil components, their interactions with DNA molecules and the factors that affect such interactions. This review highlights some important considerations required prior to DNA extraction and discusses the use of common chemical reagents in soil DNA extraction protocols to achieve maximum efficacy. Together, the information presented here is designed to facilitate informed decisions about the most appropriate sampling and extraction methodology, relevant both to the soil type and the details of a specific forensic case, to ensure sufficient DNA yield and enable successful analysis.
Copyright © 2014 Forensic Science Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  DNA; Extraction; Forensic; HTS; Metagenomics; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24796953     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of performance and efficiency of four methods to extract genomic DNA from oil contaminated soils in southwestern of Iran.

Authors:  Yalda Basim; Sahand Jorfi; Mehdi Ahmadi Moghadam; Nematollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard; Ghasemali Mohebali; Ramin Nabizadeh; Ata Ghadiri; Farid Soleymani
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 2.  Microbiomes in forensic botany: a review.

Authors:  Sarah Ishak; Eleanor Dormontt; Jennifer M Young
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 3.  The Future of Environmental DNA in Forensic Science.

Authors:  Julia S Allwood; Noah Fierer; Robert R Dunn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Characterization and Comparison of Convergence Among Cephalotus follicularis Pitcher Plant-Associated Communities With Those of Nepenthes and Sarracenia Found Worldwide.

Authors:  Leonora S Bittleston; Elizabeth L Benson; Jessica R Bernardin; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Evaluation of Molecular Methods To Improve the Detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Soil and Water Samples from Laos.

Authors:  Michael Knappik; David A B Dance; Sayaphet Rattanavong; Alain Pierret; Olivier Ribolzi; Viengmon Davong; Joy Silisouk; Manivanh Vongsouvath; Paul N Newton; Sabine Dittrich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Random whole metagenomic sequencing for forensic discrimination of soils.

Authors:  Anastasia S Khodakova; Renee J Smith; Leigh Burgoyne; Damien Abarno; Adrian Linacre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An efficient and cost-effective method for DNA extraction from athalassohaline soil using a newly formulated cell extraction buffer.

Authors:  Avinash Narayan; Kunal Jain; Amita R Shah; Datta Madamwar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Transparent DNA/RNA Co-extraction Workflow Protocol Suitable for Inhibitor-Rich Environmental Samples That Focuses on Complete DNA Removal for Transcriptomic Analyses.

Authors:  Natalie Y N Lim; Constance A Roco; Åsa Frostegård
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Necessity of purification during bacterial DNA extraction with environmental soils.

Authors:  Hyun Jeong Lim; Jung-Hyun Choi; Ahjeong Son
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-08

10.  Widespread Environmental Contamination with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Revealed by a Molecular Detection Protocol.

Authors:  Nuno Santos; Catarina Santos; Teresa Valente; Christian Gortázar; Virgílio Almeida; Margarida Correia-Neves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.