Erika L Sabbath1, M Maria Glymour2, Alexis Descatha3, Annette Leclerc4, Marie Zins5, Marcel Goldberg6, Lisa F Berkman7. 1. Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, 9 Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: esabbath@hsph.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: mglymour@hsph.harvard.edu. 3. Université Versailles Saint-Quentin UMRS 1018, Versailles, France; Inserm, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), U1018, "Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts" Research Platform, F-94807 Villejuif, France. Electronic address: alexis.descatha@inserm.fr. 4. Université Versailles Saint-Quentin UMRS 1018, Versailles, France; Inserm, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), U1018, "Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts" Research Platform, F-94807 Villejuif, France. Electronic address: Annette.leclerc@inserm.fr. 5. Université Versailles Saint-Quentin UMRS 1018, Versailles, France; Inserm, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), U1018, "Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts" Research Platform, F-94807 Villejuif, France. Electronic address: marie.zins@inserm.fr. 6. Université Versailles Saint-Quentin UMRS 1018, Versailles, France; Inserm, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), U1018, "Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts" Research Platform, F-94807 Villejuif, France. Electronic address: marcel.goldberg@inserm.fr. 7. Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, 9 Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: lberkman@hsph.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Biomechanical and psychosocial occupational exposures are seldom considered simultaneously and over extended follow-up in occupational epidemiologic studies, although there is some evidence that combined exposures have interactive effects on workers' health during working life. Given high prevalence of functional disability among retirees, research on earlier-life determinants of subsequent functional outcomes can help shape workplace policies and practices. This study investigates whether health effects of combined occupational exposures during working life are observed after individuals retire and are no longer exposed. METHODS: Analyses were conducted among retirees in the French GAZEL occupational cohort (n=9168). Cumulative exposure during working life to eight biomechanical strains and to one or more reports of psychosocial job strain (high-demand, low-control work) were assessed as predictors of three outcomes: difficulty with physical functioning, role limitations due to physical difficulties, and bodily pain. Individuals were classified by joint exposure to both biomechanical and psychosocial constraints. We modeled risk ratios (RR) between exposure to biomechanical and psychosocial factors at work (separately and in combination) and disability after retirement, and we calculated the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) to test whether combined effects departed from additivity. RESULTS: Both psychosocial and biomechanical exposures during working life were independent predictors of the three functional health outcomes. Compared with individuals who had neither biomechanical nor psychosocial exposures, in fully adjusted log-binomial models of the combined effects of biomechanical and psychosocial exposure, among those with low biomechanical exposures, the RR for physical functioning difficulties associated with psychosocial exposures was 1.18 (95% CI 1.01, 1.37). Among those with the highest levels of biomechanical exposures, RR was 1.42 (95% CI 1.21, 1.65) among those with low psychosocial exposures and 1.91 (95% CI 1.61, 2.26) among those with high psychosocial exposures. The two exposure types were modestly super-additive, with an RERI of 0.32 (95% CI 0.00, 0.62) between those with the highest and lowest levels of biomechanical exposures; if the effects were strictly additive, we would have expected an RERI of 0. For the other two outcomes results were similar, although there was no significant departure from additivity. Some effects varied in magnitude by gender. CONCLUSION: Across the sample, combined biomechanical and psychosocial occupational exposures during working life appear to have additive or perhaps interactive effects on functional health in retirement. However, the relationship is less straightforward among women. Improving overall working conditions may lessen future disability among retirees.
OBJECTIVES: Biomechanical and psychosocial occupational exposures are seldom considered simultaneously and over extended follow-up in occupational epidemiologic studies, although there is some evidence that combined exposures have interactive effects on workers' health during working life. Given high prevalence of functional disability among retirees, research on earlier-life determinants of subsequent functional outcomes can help shape workplace policies and practices. This study investigates whether health effects of combined occupational exposures during working life are observed after individuals retire and are no longer exposed. METHODS: Analyses were conducted among retirees in the French GAZEL occupational cohort (n=9168). Cumulative exposure during working life to eight biomechanical strains and to one or more reports of psychosocial job strain (high-demand, low-control work) were assessed as predictors of three outcomes: difficulty with physical functioning, role limitations due to physical difficulties, and bodily pain. Individuals were classified by joint exposure to both biomechanical and psychosocial constraints. We modeled risk ratios (RR) between exposure to biomechanical and psychosocial factors at work (separately and in combination) and disability after retirement, and we calculated the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) to test whether combined effects departed from additivity. RESULTS: Both psychosocial and biomechanical exposures during working life were independent predictors of the three functional health outcomes. Compared with individuals who had neither biomechanical nor psychosocial exposures, in fully adjusted log-binomial models of the combined effects of biomechanical and psychosocial exposure, among those with low biomechanical exposures, the RR for physical functioning difficulties associated with psychosocial exposures was 1.18 (95% CI 1.01, 1.37). Among those with the highest levels of biomechanical exposures, RR was 1.42 (95% CI 1.21, 1.65) among those with low psychosocial exposures and 1.91 (95% CI 1.61, 2.26) among those with high psychosocial exposures. The two exposure types were modestly super-additive, with an RERI of 0.32 (95% CI 0.00, 0.62) between those with the highest and lowest levels of biomechanical exposures; if the effects were strictly additive, we would have expected an RERI of 0. For the other two outcomes results were similar, although there was no significant departure from additivity. Some effects varied in magnitude by gender. CONCLUSION: Across the sample, combined biomechanical and psychosocial occupational exposures during working life appear to have additive or perhaps interactive effects on functional health in retirement. However, the relationship is less straightforward among women. Improving overall working conditions may lessen future disability among retirees.
Authors: K C Prakash; Subas Neupane; Päivi Leino-Arjas; Mikaela B von Bonsdorff; Taina Rantanen; Monika E von Bonsdorff; Jorma Seitsamo; Juhani Ilmarinen; Clas-Håkan Nygård Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Aimee J Palumbo; Anneclaire J De Roos; Carolyn Cannuscio; Lucy Robinson; Jana Mossey; Julie Weitlauf; Lorena Garcia; Robert Wallace; Yvonne Michael Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-04-15 Impact factor: 3.390