Literature DB >> 24796633

Prospective quality of life outcomes following robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Jeremie Abitbol1, Susie Lau2, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar3, Joshua Z Press2, Nancy Drummond2, Zeev Rosberger4, Sylvie Aubin4, Raphael Gotlieb2, Jeffrey How2, Walter H Gotlieb5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of gynecologic cancers.
METHODS: 211 patients completed a quality of life questionnaire before surgery. Postoperative questionnaires, consisting of the same assessment with the addition of postoperative questions, were given at 1 week, 3 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and its subscales were used to evaluate HRQL. Patient-rated body image was evaluated using the Body Image Scale. Statistical significance was measured by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Minimally important difference (MID) values were analyzed to evaluate clinical significance.
RESULTS: Overall HRQL and body image decreased at 1 week after surgery and returned to baseline by 3 weeks. Physical and functional well-being decreased at 1 week after surgery and returned to baseline by 3 months after surgery. However, using MID criteria, physical well-being returned to baseline by 3 weeks. Social well-being did not change significantly. Emotional well-being increased immediately by 1 week after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Patient reported HRQL outcomes following robotic surgery for the treatment of gynecologic cancers suggests a rapid return to pre-surgery values.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic surgery; body image; outcome; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24796633     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

1.  Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Richard G Arms; Charlotte C Sun; Jennifer K Burzawa; Nicole D Fleming; Alpa M Nick; Vijayashri Rallapalli; Shannon N Westin; Larissa A Meyer; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  The health-related quality of life journey of gynecologic oncology surgical patients: Implications for the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into surgical quality metrics.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Emma L Barber; Jeannette T Bensen; Anna C Snavely; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  The roles and limitations of robotic surgery for obese endometrial cancer patients: a common challenge in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Teuta Shemshedini; Tana S Pradhan; Tarah L Pua; Sean S Tedjarati
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-05-01

4.  Comparative health technology assessment of robotic-assisted, direct manual laparoscopic and open surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Turchetti; Francesca Pierotti; Ilaria Palla; Stefania Manetti; Cinzia Freschi; Vincenzo Ferrari; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.