Literature DB >> 24796556

Pathways into living alone in mid-life: diversity and policy implications.

Dieter Demey1, Ann Berrington2, Maria Evandrou3, Jane Falkingham4.   

Abstract

This paper adopts a life course approach to investigate the pathways into living alone in mid-life in Britain and how these vary by gender and socio-economic status. The rise in the proportion of people living alone over the past three decades has been well documented. However, much of the focus of the existing literature has been on either people living solo in young adulthood or in later life. Mid-life has received surprising little scholarly attention, despite the fact that living arrangements in mid-life are changing rapidly, and that household composition and socio-economic circumstances in the period immediately prior to retirement are strongly associated with living arrangements and associated sources of support in later life. This paper therefore aims to fill this gap. We begin with a review of previous research on living alone and present a conceptual framework of the pathways into living alone in mid-life. Data from the United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Survey (UKHLS) are used to analyse the partnership and parenthood histories and socio-economic characteristics of those currently living alone in mid-life. The findings indicate that the dissolution of a marriage with children is the dominant pathway into mid-life solo-living, but that there is also a substantial group of never partnered men living alone. These never partnered men are split between those with low and high socio-economic status. Distinguishing between different groups of individuals living alone in mid-life is important for policy as these groups of men and women will have different social and financial resources as they enter later life. Mid-life men living alone who have not had children, have no educational qualifications, are not economically active and who live in rented housing are likely to be most at risk of needing a social and economic 'safety net' in old age.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baby-boom cohort; Living alone; Mid-life; Partnership trajectory; Pathways; Policy implications

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24796556     DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2013.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Life Course Res        ISSN: 1569-4909


  6 in total

1.  Life-Course Partnership Status and Biomarkers in Midlife: Evidence From the 1958 British Birth Cohort.

Authors:  George B Ploubidis; Richard J Silverwood; Bianca DeStavola; Emily Grundy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Relationship between living alone and common mental disorders in the 1993, 2000 and 2007 National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys.

Authors:  Louis Jacob; Josep Maria Haro; Ai Koyanagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Gender differences and individual, household, and workplace characteristics: Regional geographies of extended working lives.

Authors:  Nicola Shelton; Jenny Head; Ewan Carr; Paola Zaninotto; Gareth Hagger-Johnson; Emily Murray
Journal:  Popul Space Place       Date:  2018-11-21

4.  Housing environment and mental health of Europeans during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Amélie Keller; Jonathan Groot; Joane Matta; Feifei Bu; Tarik El Aarbaoui; Maria Melchior; Daisy Fancourt; Marie Zins; Marcel Goldberg; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Naja H Rod; Katrine Strandberg-Larsen; Tibor V Varga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Counting the Population or Describing Society? A Comparison of English and Welsh and French Censuses.

Authors:  Ernestina Coast; Alex Fanghanel; Eva Lelièvre; Sara Randall
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  2016-01-21

6.  Re-thinking residential mobility: Linking lives through time and space.

Authors:  Rory Coulter; Maarten van Ham; Allan M Findlay
Journal:  Prog Hum Geogr       Date:  2015-03-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.