Literature DB >> 24796239

The transition to a teaching hospital: patient satisfaction before and after the introduction of medical students.

Roberto Esguerra1, Jaime Toro, José Miguel Ospina, Alexandra Porras, Camilo Díaz, Saúl Reyes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have explored the effect of the presence of medical students on patient satisfaction. However, nearly all of these studies took place in hospitals where medical students had been involved in patient care for many years. Less is known about patients' perceptions of care in a hospital moving toward becoming a teaching facility with undergraduate students. No research has explored patient satisfaction before and after the introduction of medical students.
OBJECTIVE: To assess patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care (QoC) from the patients' perspective, before and after the presence of medical students in a general hospital setting.
METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at Hospital Universitario-Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (HU-FSFB) in Bogotá, Colombia. The study had two phases. In 2006, prior to HU-FSBF becoming a teaching hospital, 385 subjects were asked to fill out a closed-question questionnaire addressing patients' satisfaction and perception of QoC provided by attending physicians. During the second period in 2009, 372 patients answered the same questionnaire when medical students were involved in their care.
RESULTS: Patients' perceptions of QoC provided by attending physicians improved in five aspects when medical students were present: friendliness (p = 0.003), competence providing medical care (p = 0.049), quality of information provided (p = 0.025), amount of time spent with the patient (p < 0.001) and availability to personally provide care (p < 0.001). Overall patient satisfaction also significantly increased (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of medical students does not negatively affect patients' perceptions of QoC, on the contrary, these results provide evidence of improved patient satisfaction in several aspects of care when medical students were involved. The relevance of this study lies in its unique way of comparing patient satisfaction before and after the introduction of medical students. This setting helps elucidate the real effect of the presence of medical students on patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24796239     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  6 in total

1.  Experiences of Patients with Mental Illness' Interactions with Medical Students: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samuel P Dearman; Adam B Joiner; Morris Gordon; Gill Vince
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Rural Disparities in Hospital Patient Satisfaction: Multilevel Analysis of the Massachusetts AHA, SID, and HCAHPS Data.

Authors:  Yu Sunny Kang; Huey-Ming Tzeng; Ting Zhang
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-09-23

3.  Impact of Medical Students on Patient Satisfaction of Pregnant Women in Labor and Delivery Triage.

Authors:  Tani Malhotra; Stephanie Thomas; Kavita S Arora
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-11

4.  Psychiatric patients' perspectives of student involvement in their care.

Authors:  Caisa Öster; Susan Bäckström; Ingrid Lantz; Mia Ramklint
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Introducing Medical Students into the Emergency Department: The Impact upon Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Christopher Kiefer; Joseph S Turner; Shelley M Layman; Stephen M Davis; Bart R Besinger; Aloysius Humbert
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-22

6.  Ethical dilemma of identity disclosure faced by medical students in clinical clerkships: A nationwide multicenter study in China.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Yihan Cao; Lu Che; Qining Fu; Shuang Song; Bingbin Zhao; Shuo Zhang; Weiwen Zhang; Xiang Li; Stephanie Choi; Jun Zhao; Hanwen Zhang; Yunzhu Li; Haopeng Xu; Hui Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.