Literature DB >> 24795834

How the Brain Process Stimulus-Response Conflict? New Insights from Lateralized Readiness Potentials Scalp Topography and Reaction Times.

Marc E Lavoie1, Johannes E A Stauder2.   

Abstract

Stimulus-Response Compatibility (SRC) refers to the fact that some tasks are performed easier and better than others because of the way stimuli and responses are paired with each other. To assess the brain responses to stimulus-response conflicts, we investigated the behavioral (accuracy and Reaction Times: RTs) as well as the physiological response (Lateralized Readiness Potentials: LRP) modulations in a positional blocked and a conditional mixed design in twelve university students. Results revealed that the performance was less accurate and the RTs, as well as the LRP onset, were delayed under the mixed conditional design. A greater compatibility effect was also noted on accuracy, RTs and LRP onset latency in the mixed design. Consistent with these findings, smaller peak activation at fronto-central areas suggests that more selective inhibition is needed in a mixed design context. Despite a smaller activation, the topographical distribution is similar in both designs. These results indicate that the translation time between stimulus- and response codes are greater under the mixed instruction, while the similar LRP topography suggests that common neural structures underlie LRPs in response to both type of designs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lateralized Readiness Potentials; Mixed-Blocked Designs; Reaction Times; Stimulus Response-Compatibility

Year:  2013        PMID: 24795834      PMCID: PMC4006818          DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2013.31014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 2160-5866


  22 in total

1.  The lateralized readiness potential: relationship between human data and response activation in a connectionist model.

Authors:  K M Spencer; M G Coles
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Effects of preliminary perceptual output on neuronal activity of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  J Miller; A Riehle; J Requin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

4.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

Review 5.  The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: A short review.

Authors:  Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-09-09

6.  Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET.

Authors:  C D Frith; K Friston; P F Liddle; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1991-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Movement- and task-related activations of motor cortical areas: a positron emission tomographic study.

Authors:  P Remy; M Zilbovicius; A Leroy-Willig; A Syrota; Y Samson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain.

Authors:  J C Woestenburg; M N Verbaten; J L Slangen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1983 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.

Authors:  M Tagliabue; M Zorzi; C Umiltà; F Bassignani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.