Louise Schinckus1, Stephan Van den Broucke2, Marie Housiaux2. 1. Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Electronic address: louise.schinckus@uclouvain.be. 2. Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As diabetes requires extensive self-care, self-management education is widely recommended to enhance the effectiveness and reduce the costs of treatment. While a variety of diabetes self-management (DSM) programs are available, the conditions for their effective implementation are not well documented. This paper reviews the literature on implementation fidelity (IF), the degree to which programs are delivered as intended, as a factor influencing the effectiveness of diabetes education. METHODS: Medical, psychological and educational research databases were searched to identify published studies on diabetes education describing the implementation process. Studies detailing the intervention adherence/fidelity/integrity were included to assess the way key elements of IF were addressed. RESULTS: From an initial 418 abstracts, 20 published papers were retained for an in-depth analysis focusing on the components of IF. Intervention content was mainly assessed through observation, whereas intervention dose was more often assessed through self-report measures. Only one study addressed the relationship between IF and intervention effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Despite the importance of IF to achieve program outcomes, IF of DSM programs remains largely under-investigated. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The results of this review suggest that reports on DSM education should systematically describe how the program was implemented. The impact of IF on program outcomes needs further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: As diabetes requires extensive self-care, self-management education is widely recommended to enhance the effectiveness and reduce the costs of treatment. While a variety of diabetes self-management (DSM) programs are available, the conditions for their effective implementation are not well documented. This paper reviews the literature on implementation fidelity (IF), the degree to which programs are delivered as intended, as a factor influencing the effectiveness of diabetes education. METHODS: Medical, psychological and educational research databases were searched to identify published studies on diabetes education describing the implementation process. Studies detailing the intervention adherence/fidelity/integrity were included to assess the way key elements of IF were addressed. RESULTS: From an initial 418 abstracts, 20 published papers were retained for an in-depth analysis focusing on the components of IF. Intervention content was mainly assessed through observation, whereas intervention dose was more often assessed through self-report measures. Only one study addressed the relationship between IF and intervention effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Despite the importance of IF to achieve program outcomes, IF of DSM programs remains largely under-investigated. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The results of this review suggest that reports on DSM education should systematically describe how the program was implemented. The impact of IF on program outcomes needs further investigation.
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David E Goodrich; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Robert Holleman; Leah Gillon; Susan Kirsh; Caroline R Richardson; Lesley D Lutes Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Mary H Wilde; Dianne Liebel; Eileen Fairbanks; Paula Wilson; Margaret Lash; Shivani Shah; Margaret V McDonald; Judith Brasch; Feng Zhang; Eileen Scheid; James M McMahon Journal: Home Health Care Serv Q Date: 2015 Apr-Jun
Authors: Stephanie Mazzucca; Elva M Arredondo; Deanna M Hoelscher; Debra Haire-Joshu; Rachel G Tabak; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Ross C Brownson Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 21.870
Authors: Viviane F A Van Casteren; Nathalie H E Bossuyt; Sarah J S Moreels; Geert Goderis; Katrien Vanthomme; Johan Wens; Etienne W De Clercq Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2015-07-13