Connor Clark1, Jugal Kalita1. 1. Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: As biological inquiry produces ever more network data, such as protein-protein interaction networks, gene regulatory networks and metabolic networks, many algorithms have been proposed for the purpose of pairwise network alignment-finding a mapping from the nodes of one network to the nodes of another in such a way that the mapped nodes can be considered to correspond with respect to both their place in the network topology and their biological attributes. This technique is helpful in identifying previously undiscovered homologies between proteins of different species and revealing functionally similar subnetworks. In the past few years, a wealth of different aligners has been published, but few of them have been compared with one another, and no comprehensive review of these algorithms has yet appeared. RESULTS: We present the problem of biological network alignment, provide a guide to existing alignment algorithms and comprehensively benchmark existing algorithms on both synthetic and real-world biological data, finding dramatic differences between existing algorithms in the quality of the alignments they produce. Additionally, we find that many of these tools are inconvenient to use in practice, and there remains a need for easy-to-use cross-platform tools for performing network alignment.
MOTIVATION: As biological inquiry produces ever more network data, such as protein-protein interaction networks, gene regulatory networks and metabolic networks, many algorithms have been proposed for the purpose of pairwise network alignment-finding a mapping from the nodes of one network to the nodes of another in such a way that the mapped nodes can be considered to correspond with respect to both their place in the network topology and their biological attributes. This technique is helpful in identifying previously undiscovered homologies between proteins of different species and revealing functionally similar subnetworks. In the past few years, a wealth of different aligners has been published, but few of them have been compared with one another, and no comprehensive review of these algorithms has yet appeared. RESULTS: We present the problem of biological network alignment, provide a guide to existing alignment algorithms and comprehensively benchmark existing algorithms on both synthetic and real-world biological data, finding dramatic differences between existing algorithms in the quality of the alignments they produce. Additionally, we find that many of these tools are inconvenient to use in practice, and there remains a need for easy-to-use cross-platform tools for performing network alignment.
Authors: Jason Fan; Anthony Cannistra; Inbar Fried; Tim Lim; Thomas Schaffner; Mark Crovella; Benjamin Hescott; Mark D M Leiserson Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sebastian Racedo; Ivan Portnoy; Jorge I Vélez; Homero San-Juan-Vergara; Marco Sanjuan; Eduardo Zurek Journal: BioData Min Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 2.522