Literature DB >> 24794894

Amphiphilic beads as depots for sustained drug release integrated into fibrillar scaffolds.

Akhilesh K Gaharwar1, Silvia M Mihaila2, Ashish A Kulkarni3, Alpesh Patel3, Andrea Di Luca4, Rui L Reis5, Manuela E Gomes5, Clemens van Blitterswijk4, Lorenzo Moroni6, Ali Khademhosseini7.   

Abstract

Native extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex fibrous structure loaded with bioactive cues that affects the surrounding cells. A promising strategy to mimicking native tissue architecture for tissue engineering applications is to engineer fibrous scaffolds using electrospinning. By loading appropriate bioactive cues within these fibrous scaffolds, various cellular functions such as cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation can be regulated. Here, we report on the encapsulation and sustained release of a model hydrophobic drug (dexamethasone (Dex)) within beaded fibrillar scaffold of poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)-poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT), a polyether-ester multiblock copolymer to direct differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). The amphiphilic beads act as depots for sustained drug release that is integrated into the fibrillar scaffolds. The entrapment of Dex within the beaded structure results in sustained release of the drug over the period of 28days. This is mainly attributed to the diffusion driven release of Dex from the amphiphilic electrospun scaffolds. In vitro results indicate that hMSCs cultured on Dex containing beaded fibrillar scaffolds exhibit an increase in osteogenic differentiation potential, as evidenced by increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, compared to the direct infusion of Dex in the culture medium. The formation of a mineralized matrix is also significantly enhanced due to the controlled Dex release from the fibrous scaffolds. This approach can be used to engineer scaffolds with appropriate chemical cues to direct tissue regeneration.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphiphilic polymer; Drug release; Electrospinning; Fibrous scaffolds; Human mesenchymal stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794894      PMCID: PMC4079754          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  61 in total

1.  Fiber diameter and texture of electrospun PEOT/PBT scaffolds influence human mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and morphology, and the release of incorporated compounds.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moroni; Ruud Licht; Jan de Boer; Joost R de Wijn; Clemens A van Blitterswijk
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Controlled drug delivery in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Marco Biondi; Francesca Ungaro; Fabiana Quaglia; Paolo Antonio Netti
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Travis J Sill; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Effects of continuous dexamethasone treatment on differentiation capabilities of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells.

Authors:  Hidekazu Oshina; Shinichi Sotome; Toshitaka Yoshii; Ichiro Torigoe; Yumi Sugata; Hidetsugu Maehara; Eriko Marukawa; Ken Omura; Kenichi Shinomiya
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Surface-functionalized electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering and drug delivery.

Authors:  Hyuk Sang Yoo; Taek Gyoung Kim; Tae Gwan Park
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Functionalizing electrospun fibers with biologically relevant macromolecules.

Authors:  Cheryl L Casper; Nori Yamaguchi; Kristi L Kiick; John F Rabolt
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 7.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Highly extensible, tough, and elastomeric nanocomposite hydrogels from poly(ethylene glycol) and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.

Authors:  Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Sandhya A Dammu; Jamie M Canter; Chia-Jung Wu; Gudrun Schmidt
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 6.988

9.  Highly elastomeric poly(glycerol sebacate)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) amphiphilic block copolymers.

Authors:  Alpesh Patel; Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Giorgio Iviglia; Hongbin Zhang; Shilpaa Mukundan; Silvia M Mihaila; Danilo Demarchi; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Amphiphilic block copolymers for drug delivery.

Authors:  Monica L Adams; Afsaneh Lavasanifar; Glen S Kwon
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.534

View more
  11 in total

1.  Biodegradable PEG-Based Amphiphilic Block Copolymers for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Artem B Kutikov; Jie Song
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Anisotropic poly (glycerol sebacate)-poly (ϵ-caprolactone) electrospun fibers promote endothelial cell guidance.

Authors:  Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Mehdi Nikkhah; Shilpa Sant; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 3.  Integrating Additive Manufacturing Techniques to Improve Cell-Based Implants for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Robert P Accolla; Amberlyn M Simmons; Cherie L Stabler
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 11.092

4.  Two Different Approaches for Oral Administration of Voriconazole Loaded Formulations: Electrospun Fibers versus β-Cyclodextrin Complexes.

Authors:  Panoraia I Siafaka; Neslihan Üstündağ Okur; Mariza Mone; Spyridoula Giannakopoulou; Sevda Er; Eleni Pavlidou; Evangelos Karavas; Dimitrios N Bikiaris
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The effects of different amounts of drug microspheres on the vivo and vitro performance of the PLGA/β-TCP scaffold.

Authors:  Liulan Lin; Tianjiang Wang; Qi Zhou; Niandong Qian
Journal:  Des Monomers Polym       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 6.  Strategies to Improve Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Tianyu Yao; Matthew B Baker; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Antioxidant/Antibacterial Electrospun Nanocoatings Applied onto PLA Films.

Authors:  Bogdanel Silvestru Munteanu; Liviu Sacarescu; Ana-Lavinia Vasiliu; Gabriela Elena Hitruc; Gina M Pricope; Morten Sivertsvik; Jan Thomas Rosnes; Cornelia Vasile
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  3D-printed bioactive scaffolds from nanosilicates and PEOT/PBT for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  James K Carrow; Andrea Di Luca; Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz; Lorenzo Moroni; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2018-12-15

9.  Monitoring of Antimicrobial Drug Chloramphenicol Release from Electrospun Nano- and Microfiber Mats Using UV Imaging and Bacterial Bioreporters.

Authors:  Liis Preem; Frederik Bock; Mariliis Hinnu; Marta Putrinš; Kadi Sagor; Tanel Tenson; Andres Meos; Jesper Østergaard; Karin Kogermann
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  In vitro degradation profiles and in vivo biomaterial-tissue interactions of microwell array delivery devices.

Authors:  Elahe Hadavi; Rick H W de Vries; Alexandra M Smink; Bart de Haan; Jeroen Leijten; Leendert W Schwab; Marcel H B J Karperien; Paul de Vos; Pieter J Dijkstra; Aart A van Apeldoorn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.