Literature DB >> 24794865

Three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound score and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis: correlation with biological factors.

Wan-Ru Jia1, Wei-Min Chai2, Lei Tang3, Yi Wang4, Xiao-Chun Fei5, Bao-San Han6, Man Chen7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical value of three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) score systems in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis by comparing their diagnostic efficacy and correlation with biological factors.
METHODS: 3D-CEUS was performed in 183 patients with breast tumors by Esaote Mylab90 with SonoVue (Bracco, Italy), DCE-MRI was performed on a dedicated breast magnetic resonance imaging (DBMRI) system (Aurora Dedicated Breast MRI Systems, USA) with a dedicated breast coil. 3D-CEUS and DCE-MRI score systems were created based on tumor perfusion and vascular characteristics. Microvessel density (MVD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-9) expression were measured by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Pathological results showed 35 benign and 148 malignant breast tumors. MVD (P=0.000, r=0.76), VEGF (P=0.000, r=0.55), MMP-2 (P=0.000, r=0.39) and MMP-9 (P=0.000, r=0.41) expression were all significantly different between benignity and malignancy. Regarding 3D-CEUS 4 points as cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 85.1%, 94.3% and 86.9%, respectively, and correlated well with MVD (P=0.000, r=0.50), VEGF (P=0.000, r=0.50), MMP-2 (P=0.000, r=0.50) and MMP-9 (P=0.000, r=0.66). Taking DCE-MRI 5 points as cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 86.5%, 94.3% and 88.0%, respectively and also correlated well with MVD (P=0.000, r=0.52), VEGF (P=0.000, r=0.44), MMP-2 (P=0.000, r=0.42) and MMP-9 (P=0.000, r=0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-CEUS score system displays inspiring diagnostic performance and good agreement with DCE-MRI scoring. Moreover, both score systems correlate well with MVD, VEGF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression, and thus have great potentials in tumor angiogenesis evaluation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiogenesis; Biological factors; Breast tumor; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Three-dimensional ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794865     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  16 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of vascular heterogeneity in breast lesions using contrast-enhanced 3-D harmonic and subharmonic ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Annina Wilkes; Alexander Sevrukov; Robert F Mattrey; Kirk Wallace; Carl L Chalek; Kai E Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Using the CT features to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma from pre-invasive lesion appearing as pure or mixed ground-glass nodules.

Authors:  J Liang; X-Q Xu; H Xu; M Yuan; W Zhang; Z-F Shi; T-F Yu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  Imaging Considerations and Interprofessional Opportunities in the Care of Breast Cancer Patients in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Sara Harvey; Anum Syed; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.315

5.  Diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy and tissue cellularity.

Authors:  Ruisheng Jiang; Zhijun Ma; Haixia Dong; Shihang Sun; Xiangmin Zeng; Xiao Li
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  A literature review on the imaging methods for breast cancer.

Authors:  Reza Gerami; Saeid Sadeghi Joni; Negin Akhondi; Ali Etemadi; Mahnaz Fosouli; Aynaz Foroughi Eghbal; Zobin Souri
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-15

7.  Microvascular Ultrasonic Imaging of Angiogenesis Identifies Tumors in a Murine Spontaneous Breast Cancer Model.

Authors:  Sarah E Shelton; Jodi Stone; Fei Gao; Donglin Zeng; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2020-02-06

8.  Differential diagnosis of <3 cm renal tumors by ultrasonography: a rapid, quantitative, elastography self-corrected contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging mode beyond screening.

Authors:  Di Sun; Qijie Lu; Cong Wei; Yi Li; Yuanyi Zheng; Bing Hu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Molecular imaging of breast cancer: present and future directions.

Authors:  David Alcantara; Manuel Pernia Leal; Irene García-Bocanegra; Maria L García-Martín
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology.

Authors:  Wan-Ru Jia; Lei Tang; Deng-Bin Wang; Wei-Min Chai; Xiao-Chun Fei; Jian-Rong He; Man Chen; Wen-Ping Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.