Melanie Thomas1, Cassandra Vieten2, Nancy Adler3, Ingrid Ammondson2, Kimberly Coleman-Phox4, Elissa Epel3, Barbara Laraia5. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: Melanie.Thomas@ucsf.edu. 2. California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, California. 4. Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, California. 5. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prepregnancy body mass index and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Because stress contributes to obesity and eating behaviors, stress reduction interventions during pregnancy may be a novel way to influence GWG, positively affect maternal and infant outcomes, and address the obesity epidemic intergenerationally. METHODS: Our research team is developing a mindfulness-based stress reduction and nutrition intervention for low-income, overweight and obese pregnant women, with healthy GWG as the primary outcome measure. To inform development of the intervention, we conducted focus groups with our target population. Focus group transcripts were analyzed for themes related to sources and importance of stress, relationship between stress and eating, and motivation for a stress reduction pregnancy intervention. FINDINGS: Fifty-nine low-income pregnant women from the San Francisco Bay Area participated in focus groups and completed a questionnaire. The vast majority of women (80%) reported experiencing significant stress from a variety of sources and most recognized a relationship between stress and eating in their lives. CONCLUSIONS: This at-risk population seems to be extremely interested in a stress reduction intervention to support healthy GWG during pregnancy. The women in our groups described high levels of stress and a desire for programs beyond basic dietary recommendations. These findings inform practitioners and policymakers interested in pregnancy as a "window of opportunity" for behavior change that can affect the metabolic and weight trajectory both for women and their offspring.
BACKGROUND: Prepregnancy body mass index and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Because stress contributes to obesity and eating behaviors, stress reduction interventions during pregnancy may be a novel way to influence GWG, positively affect maternal and infant outcomes, and address the obesity epidemic intergenerationally. METHODS: Our research team is developing a mindfulness-based stress reduction and nutrition intervention for low-income, overweight and obese pregnant women, with healthy GWG as the primary outcome measure. To inform development of the intervention, we conducted focus groups with our target population. Focus group transcripts were analyzed for themes related to sources and importance of stress, relationship between stress and eating, and motivation for a stress reduction pregnancy intervention. FINDINGS: Fifty-nine low-income pregnant women from the San Francisco Bay Area participated in focus groups and completed a questionnaire. The vast majority of women (80%) reported experiencing significant stress from a variety of sources and most recognized a relationship between stress and eating in their lives. CONCLUSIONS: This at-risk population seems to be extremely interested in a stress reduction intervention to support healthy GWG during pregnancy. The women in our groups described high levels of stress and a desire for programs beyond basic dietary recommendations. These findings inform practitioners and policymakers interested in pregnancy as a "window of opportunity" for behavior change that can affect the metabolic and weight trajectory both for women and their offspring.
Authors: Marci Lobel; Dolores Lacey Cannella; Jennifer E Graham; Carla DeVincent; Jayne Schneider; Bruce A Meyer Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Abdullah A Mamun; Mansey Kinarivala; Michael J O'Callaghan; Gail M Williams; Jake M Najman; Leonie K Callaway Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jennifer Daubenmier; Jean Kristeller; Frederick M Hecht; Nicole Maninger; Margaret Kuwata; Kinnari Jhaveri; Robert H Lustig; Margaret Kemeny; Lori Karan; Elissa Epel Journal: J Obes Date: 2011-10-02
Authors: Jennifer Huberty; Jenn A Leiferman; Abbey R Kruper; Lisette T Jacobson; Molly E Waring; Jeni L Matthews; Danielle M Wischenka; Betty Braxter; Sara L Kornfield Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2016-11-17
Authors: John W Apolzan; Candice A Myers; Amanda D Cowley; Heather Brady; Daniel S Hsia; Tiffany M Stewart; Leanne M Redman; Corby K Martin Journal: Appetite Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Ai Kubo; Assiamira Ferrara; Susan D Brown; Samantha F Ehrlich; Ai-Lin Tsai; Charles P Quesenberry; Yvonne Crites; Monique M Hedderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Helena Walz; Barbara Bohn; Jessica Sander; Claudia Eberle; Monika Alisch; Bernhard Oswald; Anja Kroke Journal: AIMS Public Health Date: 2015-08-21