J Martijn Bos1, Melissa L Will1, Bernard J Gersh2, Teresa M Kruisselbrink3, Steve R Ommen2, Michael J Ackerman4. 1. Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3. Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4. Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: ackerman.michael@mayo.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of mutations and genotype-phenotype relationships in the largest hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohort to date and to provide an easy, clinically applicable phenotype-derived score that provides a pretest probability for a positive HCM genetic test result. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1, 1997, and February 1, 2007, 1053 unrelated patients with the clinical diagnosis of HCM (60% male; mean ± SD age at diagnosis, 44.4 ± 19 years) had HCM genetic testing for the 9 HCM-associated myofilament genes. Phenotyping was performed by review of electronic medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 359 patients (34%) were genotype positive for a putative HCM-associated mutation in 1 or more HCM-associated genes. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the echocardiographic reverse curve morphological subtype, an age at diagnosis younger than 45 years, a maximum left ventricular wall thickness of 20 mm or greater, a family history of HCM, and a family history of sudden cardiac death as positive predictors of positive genetic test results, whereas hypertension was a negative predictor. A score, based on the number of predictors of a positive genetic test result, predicted a positive genetic test result ranging from 6% when only hypertension was present to 80% when all 5 positive predictor markers were present. CONCLUSION: In this largest HCM cohort published to date, the overall yield of genetic testing was 34%. Although all the patients were diagnosed clinically as having HCM, the presence or absence of 6 simple clinical/echocardiographic markers predicted the likelihood of mutation-positive HCM. Phenotype-guided genetic testing using the Mayo HCM Genotype Predictor score provides an easy tool for an effective genetic counseling session.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of mutations and genotype-phenotype relationships in the largest hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohort to date and to provide an easy, clinically applicable phenotype-derived score that provides a pretest probability for a positive HCM genetic test result. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1, 1997, and February 1, 2007, 1053 unrelated patients with the clinical diagnosis of HCM (60% male; mean ± SD age at diagnosis, 44.4 ± 19 years) had HCM genetic testing for the 9 HCM-associated myofilament genes. Phenotyping was performed by review of electronic medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 359 patients (34%) were genotype positive for a putative HCM-associated mutation in 1 or more HCM-associated genes. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the echocardiographic reverse curve morphological subtype, an age at diagnosis younger than 45 years, a maximum left ventricular wall thickness of 20 mm or greater, a family history of HCM, and a family history of sudden cardiac death as positive predictors of positive genetic test results, whereas hypertension was a negative predictor. A score, based on the number of predictors of a positive genetic test result, predicted a positive genetic test result ranging from 6% when only hypertension was present to 80% when all 5 positive predictor markers were present. CONCLUSION: In this largest HCM cohort published to date, the overall yield of genetic testing was 34%. Although all the patients were diagnosed clinically as having HCM, the presence or absence of 6 simple clinical/echocardiographic markers predicted the likelihood of mutation-positive HCM. Phenotype-guided genetic testing using the Mayo HCM Genotype Predictor score provides an easy tool for an effective genetic counseling session.
Authors: J A Jarcho; W McKenna; J A Pare; S D Solomon; R F Holcombe; S Dickie; T Levi; H Donis-Keller; J G Seidman; C E Seidman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1989-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sara L Van Driest; Steve R Ommen; A Jamil Tajik; Bernard J Gersh; Michael J Ackerman Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Alexander G Bick; Jason Flannick; Kaoru Ito; Susan Cheng; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael G Parfenov; Daniel S Herman; Steven R DePalma; Namrata Gupta; Stacey B Gabriel; Birgit H Funke; Heidi L Rehm; Emelia J Benjamin; Jayashri Aragam; Herman A Taylor; Ervin R Fox; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Sekar Kathiresan; Christopher J O'Donnell; James G Wilson; David M Altshuler; Joel N Hirschhorn; J G Seidman; Christine Seidman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Sara L Van Driest; Vlad C Vasile; Steve R Ommen; Melissa L Will; A Jamil Tajik; Bernard J Gersh; Michael J Ackerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-11-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Barry J Maron; Joseph J Doerer; Tammy S Haas; David M Tierney; Frederick O Mueller Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Martijn Bos; Jeanne L Theis; A Jamil Tajik; Bernard J Gersh; Steve R Ommen; Michael J Ackerman Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jodie Ingles; Laura Yeates; Lisa O'Brien; Julie McGaughran; Paul A Scuffham; John Atherton; Christopher Semsarian Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Eric M Green; Hiroko Wakimoto; Robert L Anderson; Marc J Evanchik; Joshua M Gorham; Brooke C Harrison; Marcus Henze; Raja Kawas; Johan D Oslob; Hector M Rodriguez; Yonghong Song; William Wan; Leslie A Leinwand; James A Spudich; Robert S McDowell; J G Seidman; Christine E Seidman Journal: Science Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sinead L Murphy; Jason H Anderson; Jamie D Kapplinger; Teresa M Kruisselbrink; Bernard J Gersh; Steve R Ommen; Michael J Ackerman; J Martijn Bos Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Julian R Homburger; Eric M Green; Colleen Caleshu; Margaret S Sunitha; Rebecca E Taylor; Kathleen M Ruppel; Raghu Prasad Rao Metpally; Steven D Colan; Michelle Michels; Sharlene M Day; Iacopo Olivotto; Carlos D Bustamante; Frederick E Dewey; Carolyn Y Ho; James A Spudich; Euan A Ashley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Francisco J Alvarado; J Martijn Bos; Zhiguang Yuchi; Carmen R Valdivia; Jonathan J Hernández; Yan-Ting Zhao; Dawn S Henderlong; Yan Chen; Talia R Booher; Cherisse A Marcou; Filip Van Petegem; Michael J Ackerman; Héctor H Valdivia Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-03-05
Authors: Marco Canepa; Iraklis Pozios; Pier Filippo Vianello; Pietro Ameri; Claudio Brunelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Theodore P Abraham Journal: Heart Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 5.994