Literature DB >> 24793669

Effect of one-cycle remote ischemic preconditioning to reduce myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Theodoros A Zografos1, George D Katritsis2, Ioannis Tsiafoutis3, Nikolaos Bourboulis3, Apostolos Katsivas3, Demosthenes G Katritsis4.   

Abstract

Up to 1/3 of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are complicated by troponin release. Remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) confers effective cardioprotection; however, a 30-minute remote IPC protocol may be difficult to implement during ad hoc PCI. This study was performed to assess the ability of a brief remote IPC protocol to attenuate cardiac troponin I (cTnI) release after ad hoc PCI. Ninety-four patients undergoing ad hoc PCI for stable coronary artery disease, with undetectable preprocedural cTnI, were recruited and randomized to receive remote IPC (induced by one 5-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg around the upper arm) or control after the decision for PCI was made. The primary outcome was the difference between cTnI levels 24 hours after PCI and cTnI levels before coronary angiography (ΔcTnI). ΔcTnI in the remote IPC group was significantly lower compared with the control group (0.04 ng/ml [interquartile range 0.01 to 0.14] vs 0.19 ng/ml [interquartile range 0.18 to 0.59], p <0.001). The incidence of PCI-related myocardial infarction (MI) was greater in the control group (42.6% vs 19.1%, p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, remote IPC was independently associated with ΔcTnI and PCI-related MI. In conclusion, our results suggest that even 1 cycle of remote IPC immediately before ad hoc PCI attenuates periprocedural cTnI release and reduces the incidence of type 4a MI.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24793669     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

Review 1.  Current Modalities and Mechanisms Underlying Cardioprotection by Ischemic Conditioning.

Authors:  John H Rosenberg; John H Werner; Michael J Moulton; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Remote ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Ischaemic preconditioning for the reduction of renal ischaemia reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Theo P Menting; Kimberley E Wever; Denise Md Ozdemir-van Brunschot; Daan Ja Van der Vliet; Maroeska M Rovers; Michiel C Warle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-04

4.  Can Clinical and Functional Outcomes Be Improved with an Intelligent "Internet Plus"-Based Full Disease Cycle Remote Ischemic Conditioning Program in Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Rationale and Design of the i-RIC Trial.

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Jan D Reinhardt; Jianan Li; Dayi Hu; Song Lin; Liansheng Wang; Ruozhu Dai; Zhiqing Fan; Rongjing Ding; Leilei Chen; Liang Yuan; Zhihui Xu; Yihui Cheng; Chengjie Yan; Xintong Zhang; Lu Wang; Xiu Zhang; Meiling Teng; Qiuyu Yu; Aimei Yin; Xiao Lu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces perioperative cardiac and renal events in patients undergoing elective coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials.

Authors:  Hanjun Pei; Yongjian Wu; Yingjie Wei; Yuejin Yang; Siyong Teng; Haitao Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  From Protecting the Heart to Improving Athletic Performance - the Benefits of Local and Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning.

Authors:  Vikram Sharma; Reuben Marsh; Brian Cunniffe; Marco Cardinale; Derek M Yellon; Sean M Davidson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 7.  Ischaemic conditioning and reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Prognostically relevant periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction associated with percutaneous coronary interventions: a Consensus Document of the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

Authors:  Heerajnarain Bulluck; Valeria Paradies; Emanuele Barbato; Andreas Baumbach; Hans Erik Bøtker; Davide Capodanno; Raffaele De Caterina; Claudio Cavallini; Sean M Davidson; Dmitriy N Feldman; Péter Ferdinandy; Sebastiano Gili; Mariann Gyöngyösi; Vijay Kunadian; Sze-Yuan Ooi; Rosalinda Madonna; Michael Marber; Roxana Mehran; Gjin Ndrepepa; Cinzia Perrino; Stefanie Schüpke; Johanne Silvain; Joost P G Sluijter; Giuseppe Tarantini; Gabor G Toth; Linda W Van Laake; Clemens von Birgelen; Michel Zeitouni; Allan S Jaffe; Kristian Thygesen; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Remote ischaemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Xiaowei Niu; Jingjing Zhang; De Chen; Guozhen Wan; Yiming Zhang; Yali Yao
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 1.426

10.  Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Oncology Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Rationale and Design of the ERIC-ONC Study--A Single-Center, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Robin Chung; Angshuman Maulik; Ashraf Hamarneh; Daniel Hochhauser; Derek J Hausenloy; J Malcolm Walker; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.