| Literature DB >> 24793139 |
Jeannie L Haggerty1, Danièle Roberge2, Jean-Frédéric Lévesque3, Josée Gauthier4, Christine Loignon2.
Abstract
Comparing accessibility between urban and rural areas requires measurement instruments that are equally discriminating in each context. Through focus groups we explored and compared care-seeking trajectories to understand context-specific accessibility barriers and facilitators. Rural care-seekers rely more on telephone access and experience more organizational accommodation but have fewer care options. Urban care-seekers invoke the barrier of distance more frequently. Four consequences of accessibility problems emerged across settings which could be used for valid comparisons of access: having to restart the care-seeking process, abandoning it, using emergency services for primary care, and health deterioration due to delay.Keywords: Health services research; Outcome and process assessment; Primary health care; Qualitative research; Rural health services
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24793139 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Place ISSN: 1353-8292 Impact factor: 4.078