Literature DB >> 24793041

How competitive is the match for radiology residency? Present view and historical perspective.

Jim Y Chen1, Matthew T Heller2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interest in radiology as a career among US medical students has changed. The aim of this study was to investigate the recent and historical trends in residency applications and how they have affected competitiveness in obtaining a position.
METHODS: Statistics published by the National Resident Matching Program in "Results and Data: Main Residency Match" for 1991 to 2013 were analyzed.
RESULTS: The number of radiology residency positions has trended upward over the past 23 years; however, the number of applicants from US medical schools has been widely variable. The number of applicants peaked in 2009 but has since decreased every year. The number of positions per US senior applicant (PPUSA) is a judge of specialty competitiveness on a supply-and-demand basis. A lower PPUSA indicates a more competitive specialty. Radiology saw its most competitive year in 2001, with only 0.91 PPUSA. PPUSA has been on the rise every year since 2009. From 2009 to 2013, the number of residency positions increased by 56, but there were 241 fewer US senior medical students preferring radiology. In 2013, there were 1,143 residency positions available for only 845 US senior medical students who preferred the specialty. The PPUSA was 1.35, making 2013 the least competitive year in obtaining a radiology residency position since 1998. Over the past 23 years, 5.5% of all US senior medical students have applied to radiology for residency. Interest reached an all-time high in 2009, at almost 7%. In 2013, only 4.8% of all US seniors preferred radiology, the lowest since 1999. The historical (1991-2013), current (2011-2013), and most recent (2013) PPUSAs for radiology were 1.19, 1.29, and 1.35, respectively. For comparison, the current PPUSAs for the following specialties were: 0.74 for plastic surgery, 0.83 for orthopedic surgery, 0.95 for dermatology, 1.10 for general surgery, 1.24 for obstetrics and gynecology, 1.31 for anesthesiology, 1.42 for pediatrics, and 1.80 for internal medicine (1.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Although radiology residency positions have continued to increase, interest among US seniors has dropped every year since 2009. The 2013 match was the least competitive since 1998. Over the past 3 years, the competitiveness of matching radiology on a supply-and-demand basis has been close to that of obstetrics and gynecology and anesthesiology.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Radiology; application; competitive; match; residency

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24793041     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  6 in total

1.  Specialty Choice Among Sexual and Gender Minorities in Medicine: The Role of Specialty Prestige, Perceived Inclusion, and Medical School Climate.

Authors:  Nicole A Sitkin; John E Pachankis
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.151

2.  The Gastroenterology Fellowship Match: A Decade Later.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; George Triadafilopoulos; David Limsui
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  E-learning for chest x-ray interpretation improves medical student skills and confidence levels.

Authors:  S Wentzell; L Moran; J Dobranowski; A Levinson; A Hannigan; C P Dunne; D McGrath
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Economic Recession From the COVID-19 Pandemic Signals Recruiting Difficulty Ahead for Radiology Residency Programs.

Authors:  Darel E Heitkamp; Yasha Gupta; Tirath Y Patel
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2020-05-15

5.  Artificial intelligence in radiology: does it impact medical students preference for radiology as their future career?

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Bin Dahmash; Mohammed Alabdulkareem; Aljabriyah Alfutais; Ahmed M Kamel; Feras Alkholaiwi; Shaker Alshehri; Yousof Al Zahrani; Mohammed Almoaiqel
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2020-12-11

6.  An evaluation of information online on artificial intelligence in medical imaging.

Authors:  Philip Mulryan; Naomi Ni Chleirigh; Alexander T O'Mahony; Claire Crowley; David Ryan; Patrick McLaughlin; Mark McEntee; Michael Maher; Owen J O'Connor
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-04-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.