Literature DB >> 24791965

Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study.

Taner A Usta1, Tolga Karacan, M Murat Naki, Aysel Calık, Lale Turkgeldi, Volkan Kasimogullari.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare the results of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) operations conducted using standard 2-D and 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems and discuss the findings with regard to the recent literature.
METHODS: Data from 147 patients who underwent TLH operations with 2-D or 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, during 2 year period between December 2010 and December 2012, were reviewed retrospectively. TLH operations were divided into two groups as those performed using 2-D, and those performed using 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the operation times (p = 0.037 < 0.05). The mean operation time of the 2-D laparoscopy group (134.2 ± 61.8 min) was higher than the 3-D laparoscopy group (116.8 ± 38.5 min). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2-D and 3-D groups with respect to major, minor and total complication rates (p = 0.641 > 0.05). The operation time among obese patients was significantly shorter in those in the 3-D laparoscopy group than those in the 2-D group (p = 0.041 < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Recent literature indicates that 3-D laparoscopy vision system needs to be utilized more often and a higher number of ex vivo and in vivo studies have to be conducted. Furthermore, we believe that the prevalent problems encountered during laparoscopy can be overcome by the development of real-time vision devices and the appropriate training of the laparoscopists. 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision system will help to improve surgical performance and outcome of patients undergoing gynecological minimal invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24791965     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3253-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mobolaji O Ajao; Christian R Larsen; Elmira Manoucheri; Emily R Goggins; Maja T Rask; Mary K B Cox; Avery Mushinski; Xiangmei Gu; Sarah L Cohen; Martin Rudnicki; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Evelyn M Schepers; Erik W van Zwet; Andries R H Twijnstra; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Jinbo Gao; Xiaoming Shuai; Guobin Wang; Kaixiong Tao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  4K versus 3D total laparoscopic hysterectomy by resident in training: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  S Restaino; V Vargiu; A Rosati; M Bruno; G Dinoi; E Cola; R Moroni; G Scambia; F Fanfani
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-09

5.  3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Elise Hoffmann; Gitte Bennich; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen; Jannie Lindschou; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Pernille Danneskiold Lassen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.