Literature DB >> 24791787

Side-specific mechanical properties of valve endothelial cells.

Michele Miragoli, Magdi H Yacoub, Ismail El-Hamamsy, Jose L Sanchez-Alonso, Alexey Moshkov, Napachanok Mongkoldhumrongkul, Muralindar Padala, Saravanan Paramagurunathan, Padmini Sarathchandra, Yuri E Korchev, Julia Gorelik, Adrian H Chester.   

Abstract

Aortic valve endothelial cells (ECs) function in vastly different levels of shear stress. The biomechanical characteristics of cells on each side of valve have not been investigated. We assessed the morphology and mechanical properties of cultured or native valve ECs on intact porcine aortic valve cusps using a scanning ion conductance microscope (SICM). The autocrine influence of several endothelial-derived mediators on cell compliance and the expression of actin were also examined. Cells on the aortic side of the valve are characterized by a more elongated shape and were aligned along a single axis. Measurement of EC membrane compliance using the SICM showed that the cells on the aortic side of intact valves were significantly softer than those on the ventricular side. A similar pattern was seen in cultured cells. Addition of 10(-6) M of the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside caused a significant reduction in the compliance of ventricular ECs but had no effect on cells on the aortic side of the valve. Conversely, endothelin-1 (10(-10)-10(-8) M) caused an increase in the compliance of aortic cells but had no effect on cells on the ventricular side of the valve. Aortic side EC compliance was also increased by 10(-4) M of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Immunofluorescent staining of actin filaments revealed a great density of staining in ECs on the ventricular surface. The expression of actin and the relative membrane compliance of ECs on both side of the valve were not affected by ventricular and aortic patterns of flow. This study has shown side-specific differences in the biomechanics of aortic valve ECs. These differences can have important implications for valve function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24791787     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00228.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  6 in total

Review 1.  Valvular Endothelial Cell Response to the Mechanical Environment-A Review.

Authors:  Nandini Deb; Carla M R Lacerda
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.194

Review 2.  Mechano-regulated cell-cell signaling in the context of cardiovascular tissue engineering.

Authors:  Cansu Karakaya; Jordy G M van Asten; Tommaso Ristori; Cecilia M Sahlgren; Sandra Loerakker
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 3.  Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy.

Authors:  Cheng Zhu; Kaixiang Huang; Natasha P Siepser; Lane A Baker
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 72.087

4.  Identification of side- and shear-dependent microRNAs regulating porcine aortic valve pathogenesis.

Authors:  Swetha Rathan; Casey J Ankeny; Sivakkumar Arjunon; Zannatul Ferdous; Sandeep Kumar; Joan Fernandez Esmerats; Jack M Heath; Robert M Nerem; Ajit P Yoganathan; Hanjoong Jo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effect of Side-Specific Valvular Shear Stress on the Content of Extracellular Matrix in Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Napachanok Mongkoldhumrongkul; Najma Latif; Magdi H Yacoub; Adrian H Chester
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.495

6.  After 50 Years of Heart Transplants: What Does the Next 50 Years Hold for Cardiovascular Medicine? A Perspective From the International Society for Applied Cardiovascular Biology.

Authors:  Joshua D Hutcheson; Craig J Goergen; Frederick J Schoen; Masanori Aikawa; Peter Zilla; Elena Aikawa; Glenn R Gaudette
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-02-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.