Literature DB >> 24791631

Failing to reverse a diverting stoma after lower anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Andrew Chiu1, Hong T Chan1, Carl J Brown1, Manoj J Raval1, P Terry Phang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A diverting stoma is an accepted adjunct to low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. However, some patients do not undergo a subsequent procedure to have the stoma reversed. We aim to determine incidence and risk factors for nonclosure of the diverting stoma.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of stage I to III rectal cancer patients at a single institution having LAR with curative intent and a diverting stoma.
RESULTS: We studied 162 patients. Prevalence of nonclosure of the temporary stoma was 14.5% within 13 months of the index surgery. On a multivariate linear regression model, nonclosure was associated with anastomotic leak (odds ratio 9.89, 2.31 to 43.93, P < .001) and age older than 65 (odds ratio 2.76, 1.08 to 7.48, P < .036).
CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of nonclosure of a diverting stoma after LAR for rectal cancer is substantial (14.5%). Patients should be counselled regarding this risk with particular attention to potential risk factors.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diverting stoma; Low anterior resection; Non-closure rates; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24791631     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

1.  Low preoperative maximum squeezing pressure evaluated by anorectal manometry is a risk factor for non-reversal of diverting stoma.

Authors:  Risa Fukui; Hiroaki Nozawa; Yugo Hirata; Kazushige Kawai; Keisuke Hata; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Yasutaka Shuno; Kazuhito Sasaki; Manabu Kaneko; Koji Murono; Shigenobu Emoto; Hirofumi Sonoda; Hiroaki Ishii; Soichiro Ishihara
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Considerations in Stoma Reversal.

Authors:  Karen L Sherman; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

3.  Risk factors for nonclosure of defunctioning stoma and stoma-related complications among low rectal cancer patients after sphincter-preserving surgery.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Wei Zheng; Jian Cui; Yun-Long Wu; Tian-Lei Xu; Hai-Zeng Zhang
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2020-03-26

4.  Stoma reversal after intended restorative rectal cancer resection in Denmark: nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  J B Jørgensen; R Erichsen; B G Pedersen; S Laurberg; L H Iversen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-10-06

5.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Diverting Loop Ileostomy Takedown.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Farwa Batool; Stacey D Collins; Jane Ferraro; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Timing of Closure of a Protective Loop-Ileostomy Can Be Crucial for Restoration of a Functional Digestion.

Authors:  Jens M Werner; Paul Kupke; Matthias Ertl; Sabine Opitz; Hans J Schlitt; Matthias Hornung
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.