| Literature DB >> 24790592 |
Lidia Syrtsova1, Natalia Sanina1, Konstantin Lyssenko2, Evgeniy Kabachkov1, Boris Psikha1, Natal'ja Shkondina1, Olesia Pokidova1, Alexander Kotelnikov1, Sergey Aldoshin1.
Abstract
This paper describes a comparative study of the decomposition of two nitrosyl iron complexes (Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24790592 PMCID: PMC3984828 DOI: 10.1155/2014/641407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Figure 1Chemical structures of the tetranitrosyl iron complexes (I) and (II) [14].
Figure 2Kinetic curve of the accumulation of NO in solution (the measurements were carried out by a sensor electrode) in the course of the decomposition of (I) 4 · 10−6 M in 0.05 phosphate buffer pH 7.0 under anaerobic conditions at 25°C. The dashed line represents the approximation by dx/dt = k 1 · [(I)]0 − k 1 · x − k · x 2. (I) is the complex [Fe2(SC5H11NO2)2(NO)4]SO4 · 5H2O.
Figure 3Spectra of 10−4 M (I) in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 makeup (1) and after 18 hours at 25°C (2). Extinction at ƛ = 312 nm is equal to 9.1 · 103 M−1 cm−1 and 2.6 · 103 M−1 cm−1 at 450 nm. (I) is the complex [Fe2(SC5H11NO2)2(NO)4]SO4 · 5H2O.
Figure 4Kinetics of (I) decomposition in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 at 25°C. Starting (I) concentrations are equal to 1.5 · 10−4(1) and 2 · 10−4(2) M. Circles are the experimental data. Solid lines are the simulated curves, corresponding to the experimental points. Simulation was made by means of a system of differential equations (6). (I) is the complex [Fe2(SC5H11NO2)2(NO)4]SO4 · 5H2O.
Results of kinetic modelling calculations (denote the rate constants of the reactions that are given in the text).
| [( |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 |
| 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.8 |
Figure 5Kinetics of change of absorption spectrum of (II) (1.5 · 10−4 M): spectra were registered at 30 s (1), 5 (2) min after start of reaction. Spectra 3–16 were registered further with interval 20 min. Spectra 17–22 were registered at 6.5 (17), 10.1 (18), 13 (19), 17.5 (20), 20 (21), and 24 (22) h after start of reaction. Conditions of reaction: 25°C, solvent is 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, and pH 7.0. Spectra 1–22 have 2 maxima: λ 1 = 315 nm and λ 2 = 365 nm; ε 315 nm is equal to 8.2 · 103 M−1·cm−1. The inset shows kinetics of (II) (1.5 · 10−4 M) decomposition in 0.05 M Tris-HCl-buffer pH 7.0 at 25°C (for the experimental data shown on this figure). Circles are experimental data. Approximation (theoretical curve) was made by means of y(t) = y + A · e −. (II) is the complex [Fe2(SC10H17N3O6)2(NO)4]SO4 · 2H2O.
Figure 6(1) Kinetics of HbNO formation at interaction of (II) with Hb on the base of the experimental data shown in (a). (2) Kinetics of HbNO formation at interaction of (I) with GSH in Hb presence. Hb on the base of the experimental data shown in (b). (3) Kinetics of HbNO formation in the interaction of (I) with Hb, the experimental data shown in (c). Circles are the experimental data. Solid line is the approximation by means of y(t) = y + A · (1 − e −). (Figures a, b, and c are in Supplementary Materials available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/641407). (II) is the complex [Fe2(SC10H17N3O6)2(NO)4]SO4 · 2H2O.
Figure 7Kinetics of change of absorption spectrum of (I) (1.5 · 10−4 M): spectra were registered at 30 s (1), 9 min (2) after start of reaction. Spectra 3–12 were registered further with interval of 20 min. Spectra 13–22 were registered at 4.1 (13), 5.2 (14), 6.3 (15), 8.2 (16), 10 (17), 14.9 (18), 17.1 (19), 20.1 (20), 22 (21), and 24 (22) h after start of reaction. Conditions of reaction: 25°C solvent is 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0. Spectra 1–22 have 2 maxima: λ 1 = 311 hm и λ 2 = 353 hm. The inset shows kinetics of the decomposition of (I) (1.5 · 10−4 M) in 0.05 M Tris-HCl-buffer pH 7.0 at 25°C (for the experimental data shown on this figure). Circles are the experimental data.
Results of kinetic experiments (average of three).
| Figure number | NIC | Process |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| ( | Decomposition | (3.8 ± 0.4) · 10−5 |
|
| ( | Interaction with Hb | (2.6 ± 0.3) · 10−5 |
|
| ( | Interaction with Hb and GSH | (1.5 ± 0.15) · 10−4 |
|
| ( | Interaction with Hb | (6.4 ± 0.6) · 10−4 |
|
| ( | Decomposition | (1.3 ± 0.1) · 10−4 |
|
| ( | Interaction with GSH | (6.9 ± 0.7) · 10−5 |
Figure 8Kinetics of absorption changes in the interaction of (I) (1.5 · 10−4 M) with GSH (10−3 M): spectra were registered at 45 s (1), 5 min (2), and 20 min (3) after start of reaction. Spectra 4–18 were registered further with interval 20 min. Spectra 19–28 were registered at 7.3 (19), 9.4 (20), 11.8 (21), 13.8 (22), 16.3 (23), 19.5 (24), 21.5 (25), 22.8 (26), 23 (27), and 24 (28) h after start of reaction. Conditions of reaction: 25°C, solvent is 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0. Spectra 1–28 have 2 maxima: λ 1 = 315 nm and λ 2 = 367 nm. The inset shows kinetics of (II) accumulation at interaction of (I) with GSH on the base of the experimental data shown on this figure. Circles are the experimental data. Approximation (theoretical curve) was made by means of y(t) = y o + A · e −. (I) is the complex [Fe2(SC5H11NO2)2(NO)4]SO4 · 5H2O, and (II) is the complex [Fe2(SC10H17N3O6)2(NO)4]SO4 · 2H2O.
The results of mass spectrometry (Figure 9).
| Ion mass singly charged, | Ion type | Formula for M, subunit or sequence | Origin and other comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 308 | [M + H]+ | GSH | Glutathione, C10O6N3SH17 |
| 477 | [M − GSH − 2NO + H]+ | [Fe2(GSH)2(NO)4] | Decomposition of ( |
| 538 | [M − GSH + H]+ | [Fe2(GSH)2(NO)4] | Decomposition of ( |
| 613 | [M + H]+ | GS-SG | Oxidized form of glutathione |
| 845 | [M + H]+ | [Fe2(GSH)2(NO)4] | Cation of ( |
| 867 | [M + Na]+ | [Fe2(GSH)2(NO)4] | Cation of ( |
(II) is the complex [Fe2(SC10H17N3O6)2(NO)4]SO4·2H2O.