Literature DB >> 24790246

Choice of atypical antipsychotic therapy for patients with schizophrenia: An analysis of a medicaid population.

Gordon G Liu1, Shawn X Sun2, Dale B Christensen3, Zhongyun Zhao4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients treated at Veterans Affairs facilities, demographicand clinical characteristics have been found to influence the choice of atypical antipsychotic drugs. However, little is known about the influences on the choice between olanzapine and risperidone in patients with schizophrenia enrolled in Medicaid.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether demographicand/or clinical characteristics and/or medical-service utilization before treatment were related to the choice of olanzapine versus risperidone therapy using data from a Medicaid population with schizophrenia.
METHODS: The study sample was identified in the North Carolina (NC)Medicaid claims database. Data were included from patients aged 18 to 64 years who were diagnosed with schizophrenia; had initiated treatment with olanzapine or risperidone between July 1, 1998, and October 31, 2000; had not used atypical antipsychotics during the 6 months before the start of treatment; and were continuously eligible in the NC Medicaid program during the 6 months before the start of treatment. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of the choice of olanzapine or risperidone associated with patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and medical-service utilization during the 6 months before the initiation of treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 764 patients (383 women, 381 men; mean age, 42.1 years)were included in the analysis: 420 were initially prescribed olanzapine and 344 were prescribed risperidone. Men were more likely than women to be prescribed olanzapine compared with risperidone. Patients who had a hospitalization related to a psychiatric condition during the pretreatment period were more likely to be prescribed olanzapine compared with risperidone (OR = 1.530; P = 0.043). Significant regional variation in the likelihood of prescribing olanzapine or risperidone was found, with patients being prescribed risperidone at a higher rate compared with olanzapine in 2 counties with the largest schizophrenic populations.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of data from patients with schizophrenia identified in the NC Medicaid claims database, sex, a history of psychiatric-related hospitalization, and geographic residence were found to be correlated with the selection of treatment with olanzapine versus risperidone. These findings need to be confirmed in large, randomized, prospective studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NC Medicaid; atypical antipsychotics; olanzapine; risperidone; schizophrenia

Year:  2005        PMID: 24790246      PMCID: PMC4003804          DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp        ISSN: 0011-393X


  29 in total

1.  Service use and costs of treating schizophrenia with atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  M Lewis; P McCrone; S Frangou
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Effects of risperidone therapy on the use of mental health care resources in Salt Lake County, Utah.

Authors:  C Carter; M Stevens; M Durkin
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Clinical and economic outcomes of olanzapine compared with haloperidol for schizophrenia. Results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  S H Hamilton; D A Revicki; E T Edgell; L A Genduso; G Tollefson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Olanzapine versus risperidone. A prospective comparison of clinical and economic outcomes in schizophrenia.

Authors:  E T Edgell; S W Andersen; B M Johnstone; B Dulisse; D Revicki; A Breier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Impact of risperidone on the use of mental health care resources.

Authors:  G Viale; L Mechling; G Maislin; M Durkin; L Engelhart; B J Lawrence
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  A retrospective economic evaluation of olanzapine versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Zhongyun Zhao
Journal:  Manag Care Interface       Date:  2002-02

7.  Cost evaluation of risperidone compared with olanzapine.

Authors:  Matthew J Byerly; Mary Weber; Deean Brooks; Sara Beth Casey; Sheila Elliot; Jason Hawkins
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Age and disease severity predict choice of atypical neuroleptic: a signal detection approach to physicians' prescribing decisions.

Authors:  Jerome A Yesavage; Jennifer Hoblyn; Javaid Sheikh; Jared R Tinklenberg; Art Noda; Ruth O'Hara; Catherine Fenn; Martin S Mumenthaler; Leah Friedman; Helena C Kraemer
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Economic outcomes of antipsychotic agents in a Medicaid population: traditional agents vs. risperidone.

Authors:  B S Nightengale; J M Crumly; J Liao; B J Lawrence; E W Jacobs
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1998

10.  Olanzapine versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia : a comparison of costs among Texas Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Karen L Rascati; Michael T Johnsrud; M Lynn Crismon; Maureen J Lage; Beth L Barber
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  2 in total

1.  Where You Live Matters: Quality and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Schizophrenia Care in Four State Medicaid Programs.

Authors:  Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Rita Volya; Rachel Garfield; Julie M Donohue; Judith R Lave; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effect of race-ethnicity and geography on adoption of innovations in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Margarita Alegría; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.084

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.