Literature DB >> 24789508

The "how" and "why" of including gender and age in ethnobotanical research and community-based resource management.

Jocelyn G Müller1, Riyana Boubacar, Iro Dan Guimbo.   

Abstract

This paper examines the process and outcome of participatory methods for stakeholder identification. We used focus group style participatory methodology to engage local residents in identifying key sub-groups relevant to conservation in Boumba, Niger. We then conducted a quantitative pictorial recognition study to measure the diversity of local useful plant knowledge across groups. The community identified six gender and age-class groupings relevant to the study. The effect of a participant's gender, socially-defined age class or the interaction of the two factors on the number of plants recognized varied by plant use. Medicinal plant knowledge was highest among elders. Food plant knowledge of food plants increased with age for women only. Where as the interaction of age and gender was strongest on fodder plant knowledge, where mid-aged men scored highest. We reflect on the impact that heterogeneity of local botanical knowledge has on our understanding of local natural resource use and the strengths of using a participatory approach to identifying the stakeholder groups which underlie this heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24789508      PMCID: PMC4293356          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0517-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  3 in total

1.  Participatory indicator development: what can ecologists and local communities learn from each other?

Authors:  Mark S Reed; Andrew J Dougill; Timothy R Baker
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Extant forest plantations as a potential bridge between social needs and ecological management: a comparative case study analysis.

Authors:  M E Paulson Priebe; J G Müller
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Evaluating rapid participatory rural appraisal as an assessment of ethnoecological knowledge and local biodiversity patterns.

Authors:  Jocelyn G Mueller; Issoufou Hassane Bil Assanou; Iro Dan Guimbo; Astier M Almedom
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.560

  3 in total
  11 in total

1.  Urban sustainability science: prospects for innovations through a system's perspective, relational and transformations' approaches : This article belongs to Ambio's 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Urbanization.

Authors:  Niki Frantzeskaki; Timon McPhearson; Nadja Kabisch
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 6.943

2.  Knowledge and use of wild edible plants in rural communities along Paraguay River, Pantanal, Brazil.

Authors:  Ieda Maria Bortolotto; Maria Christina de Mello Amorozo; Germano Guarim Neto; Jens Oldeland; Geraldo Alves Damasceno-Junior
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.733

3.  Comparative analysis of diversity and utilization of edible plants in arid and semi-arid areas in Benin.

Authors:  Alcade C Segnon; Enoch G Achigan-Dako
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 4.  Effect of Gender on the Knowledge of Medicinal Plants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wendy Torres-Avilez; Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros; Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Plant-derived utility products: knowledge comparison across gender, age and education from a tribal landscape of western Himalaya.

Authors:  Alpy Sharma; Deepika Thakur; Sanjay Kr Uniyal
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.733

6.  Factors that influence the plant use knowledge in the middle mountains of Nepal.

Authors:  Durga Kutal; Ripu M Kunwar; Kedar Baral; Prabhat Sapkota; Hari P Sharma; Bhagawat Rimal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment.

Authors:  Melise Pessôa Araujo Meireles; Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque; Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Ethnobotany in Rayones, Nuevo León, México.

Authors:  Eduardo Estrada-Castillón; Miriam Garza-López; José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla; María Magdalena Salinas-Rodríguez; Brianda Elizabeth Soto-Mata; Humberto González-Rodríguez; Dino Ulises González-Uribe; Israel Cantú-Silva; Artemio Carrillo-Parra; César Cantú-Ayala
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.733

9.  Cross-cultural comparison of plant use knowledge in Baitadi and Darchula districts, Nepal Himalaya.

Authors:  Ripu M Kunwar; Maria Fadiman; Mary Cameron; Rainer W Bussmann; Khum B Thapa-Magar; Bhagawat Rimal; Prabhat Sapkota
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.733

10.  Traditional knowledge and cultural importance of Borassus aethiopum Mart. in Benin: interacting effects of socio-demographic attributes and multi-scale abundance.

Authors:  Kolawolé Valère Salako; Francisco Moreira; Rodrigue Castro Gbedomon; Frédéric Tovissodé; Achille Ephrem Assogbadjo; Romain Lucas Glèlè Kakaï
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.