Grace S Crowther1, Caroline H Chilton1, Sharie L Todhunter1, Scott Nicholson1, Jane Freeman2, Simon D Baines3, Mark H Wilcox4. 1. Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. 2. Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, The General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. 3. School of Life and Medical Sciences, Department of Human and Environmental Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK. 4. Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, The General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK mark.wilcox@leedsth.nhs.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biofilms are characteristic of some chronic or recurrent infections and this mode of growth tends to reduce treatment efficacy. Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with a high rate of recurrent symptomatic disease. The presence and behaviour of C. difficile within intestinal biofilms remains largely unexplored, but may factor in recurrent infection. METHODS: A triple-stage chemostat gut model designed to facilitate the formation of intestinal biofilm was inoculated with a pooled human faecal emulsion. Bacterial populations were allowed to equilibrate before simulated CDI was induced by clindamycin (33.9 mg/L, four times daily, 7 days) and subsequently treated with vancomycin (125 mg/L, four times daily, 7 days). Indigenous gut microbiota, C. difficile total viable counts, spores, cytotoxin and antimicrobial activity in planktonic and biofilm communities were monitored during the 10 week experimental period. RESULTS: Vancomycin successfully treated the initial episode of simulated CDI, but ∼18 days after therapy cessation, recurrent infection occurred. Germination, proliferation and toxin production were evident within planktonic communities in both initial and recurrent CDI. In contrast, sessile C. difficile remained in dormant spore form for the duration of the experiment. The effects of and recovery from clindamycin and vancomycin exposure for sessile populations was delayed compared with responses for planktonic bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal biofilms provide a potential reservoir for C. difficile spore persistence, possibly facilitating their dispersal into the gut lumen after therapeutic intervention, leading to recurrent infection. Therapeutic options for CDI could have increased efficacy if they are more effective against sessile C. difficile.
BACKGROUND: Biofilms are characteristic of some chronic or recurrent infections and this mode of growth tends to reduce treatment efficacy. Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) is associated with a high rate of recurrent symptomatic disease. The presence and behaviour of C. difficile within intestinal biofilms remains largely unexplored, but may factor in recurrent infection. METHODS: A triple-stage chemostat gut model designed to facilitate the formation of intestinal biofilm was inoculated with a pooled human faecal emulsion. Bacterial populations were allowed to equilibrate before simulated CDI was induced by clindamycin (33.9 mg/L, four times daily, 7 days) and subsequently treated with vancomycin (125 mg/L, four times daily, 7 days). Indigenous gut microbiota, C. difficile total viable counts, spores, cytotoxin and antimicrobial activity in planktonic and biofilm communities were monitored during the 10 week experimental period. RESULTS:Vancomycin successfully treated the initial episode of simulated CDI, but ∼18 days after therapy cessation, recurrent infection occurred. Germination, proliferation and toxin production were evident within planktonic communities in both initial and recurrent CDI. In contrast, sessile C. difficile remained in dormant spore form for the duration of the experiment. The effects of and recovery from clindamycin and vancomycin exposure for sessile populations was delayed compared with responses for planktonic bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal biofilms provide a potential reservoir for C. difficile spore persistence, possibly facilitating their dispersal into the gut lumen after therapeutic intervention, leading to recurrent infection. Therapeutic options for CDI could have increased efficacy if they are more effective against sessile C. difficile.
Authors: M Piotrowski; P Karpiński; H Pituch; A van Belkum; P Obuch-Woszczatyński Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Melinda A Engevik; Amy C Engevik; Kristen A Engevik; Jennifer M Auchtung; Alexandra L Chang-Graham; Wenly Ruan; Ruth Ann Luna; Joseph M Hyser; Jennifer K Spinler; James Versalovic Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Yannick D N Tremblay; Benjamin A R Durand; Audrey Hamiot; Isabelle Martin-Verstraete; Marine Oberkampf; Marc Monot; Bruno Dupuy Journal: ISME J Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Tasha M Santiago-Rodriguez; Melissa Ly; Michelle C Daigneault; Ian H L Brown; Julie A K McDonald; Natasha Bonilla; Emma Allen Vercoe; David T Pride Journal: Microbiome Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 14.650