Literature DB >> 24788547

Tarsal navicular bone size in diabetics: radiographic assessment.

Elie Harmouche1, Douglas Robertson, Geza Kogler, Minzhi Xing, Michael Terk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the anecdotal observation that isolated navicular collapse is associated with diabetes mellitus, we quantified the size of the tarsal navicular bone in subjects with and without diabetes and tested for association of size with age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), gender, smoking, bone mineral density (BMD), duration, and level of control of diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ankle radiographs of 200 patients (122 female; 78 male; mean age 58 years [27-89]), 100 with type II diabetes and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were selected and reviewed. The anteroposterior (AP) dimension of the mid-navicular bone was measured from lateral radiographs. For standardization, the supero-inferior (SI) dimension of the calcaneal was measured and the navicular-calcaneus ratio calculated. Statistical evaluation included independent sample t tests and linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: Diabetic subjects had a significantly smaller navicular AP dimension and navicular-calcaneus ratio compared with controls (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0001 respectively). Age, gender, height and duration of diabetes had no association with the navicular-calcaneus ratio. The navicular-calcaneus ratio was inversely correlated with weight (p = 0.01) and BMI (p < 0.001) and directly correlated with smoking (p = 0.04). Reliability of the radiographic measurements was excellent (ICC 0.80-0.97; SEM 0.3-1.7 mm).
CONCLUSION: The anteroposterior dimension of the navicular is smaller in type II diabetic subjects than in age- and gender-matched controls. We hypothesize that this might be due to navicular collapse of multifactorial causes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24788547     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1877-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

Review 1.  The anatomy of the navicular and periarticular structures.

Authors:  Pau Golano; Oscar Fariñas; Ivan Sáenz
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.653

Review 2.  The adult tarsal navicular: why it matters.

Authors:  Andrew Scott-Moncrieff; Bruce B Forster; Gordon Andrews; Karim Khan
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.248

3.  Distribution of compression forces in the joints of the human foot.

Authors:  J T MANTER
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1946-11

4.  Talonavicular dislocations and midfoot arthropathy in neuropathic diabetic feet. Natural course and principles of treatment.

Authors:  P Lesko; R C Maurer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Bone disease in diabetes.

Authors:  M Luisa Isidro; Belén Ruano
Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev       Date:  2010-05

6.  [Biomechanical analysis of the medial arch of the foot based on a rigid body spring model].

Authors:  Y Tominaga
Journal:  Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1994-09

7.  Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. A retrospective review of twenty-one cases.

Authors:  J S Torg; H Pavlov; L H Cooley; M H Bryant; S P Arnoczky; J Bergfeld; L Y Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the tarsal navicular in an adult: Mueller-Weiss syndrome.

Authors:  Bilgehan Tosun; Firat Al; Alptekin Tosun
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  Avascular necrosis not Charcot's.

Authors:  Y P Samarasinghe; S L Brunton; M D Feher
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the tarsal navicular in adults: imaging findings.

Authors:  J Haller; D J Sartoris; D Resnick; M N Pathria; D Berthoty; B Howard; D Nordstrom
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.