Literature DB >> 24788540

Prior hysterectomy and discomfort during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Jessica K Dyson1, James M Mason2, Matthew D Rutter2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Discomfort during colonoscopy may affect acceptability of the procedure. The study aim was to determine factors, including prior hysterectomy and gender, associated with higher levels of patient discomfort during colonoscopy to help with procedural planning such as choice of instrument and sedation.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of colonoscopies (n = 1098) performed between February 2007 and March 2012 at the Tees Bowel Cancer Screening Centre within the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Determinants of moderate/severe discomfort assessed using the Gloucester Scale were explored, using logistic regression with a range of participant and procedural variables.
RESULTS: Rates of moderate/severe discomfort varied significantly among men, women without hysterectomy, and women with hysterectomy (5.8 %, 10.4 %, and 17.8 %, respectively; P < 0.001). In an unadjusted model, women with hysterectomy were significantly more likely to experience moderate/severe discomfort than those without (odds ratio [OR]1.87, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.05 - 3.32, P = 0.005). The very strong influence of sedation on discomfort level precluded an adjusted model. In subgroup analysis of participants receiving sedation, adjusted comparison again showed increased odds for moderate/severe discomfort for women with hysterectomy, compared with women without (OR 1.70, 95 %CI 1.03 - 2.80, P = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: Prior hysterectomy is associated with greater levels of moderate/severe discomfort in women undergoing colonoscopy. Minimizing participant discomfort is desirable in any screening or surveillance program. This should be considered in preprocedural counseling and in selecting equipment, sedation, and analgesia. Further studies should examine methods to minimize discomfort in those with prior hysterectomy. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24788540     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  5 in total

1.  [Risk factors of pain during colonoscopic examination].

Authors:  Xue-Ying Lai; Xiao-Wei Tang; Si-Lin Huang; Wei Gong; Fa-Chao Zhi; Si-de Liu; Ye Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-04-20

2.  Colonoscopy in Patients With a Prior Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-01

3.  Challenges during Colonoscopy in Women with a Prior Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lubna Kamani; Nazish Butt; Hanisha Khemani
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  The Manchester International Consensus Group recommendations for the management of gynecological cancers in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Emma J Crosbie; Neil A J Ryan; Mark J Arends; Tjalling Bosse; John Burn; Joanna M Cornes; Robin Crawford; Diana Eccles; Ian M Frayling; Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami; Heather Hampel; Noah D Kauff; Henry C Kitchener; Sarah J Kitson; Ranjit Manchanda; Raymond F T McMahon; Kevin J Monahan; Usha Menon; Pål Møller; Gabriela Möslein; Adam Rosenthal; Peter Sasieni; Mourad W Seif; Naveena Singh; Pauline Skarrott; Tristan M Snowsill; Robert Steele; Marc Tischkowitz; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Colonoscopy quality with Entonox®vs intravenous conscious sedation: 18608 colonoscopy retrospective study.

Authors:  Alexander R Robertson; Nicholas A Kennedy; James A Robertson; Nicholas I Church; Colin L Noble
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.