Literature DB >> 24788262

Biological information extraction and co-occurrence analysis.

Georgios A Pavlopoulos1, Vasilis J Promponas, Christos A Ouzounis, Ioannis Iliopoulos.   

Abstract

Nowadays, it is possible to identify terms corresponding to biological entities within passages in biomedical text corpora: critically, their potential relationships then need to be detected. These relationships are typically detected by co-occurrence analysis, revealing associations between bioentities through their coexistence in single sentences and/or entire abstracts. These associations implicitly define networks, whose nodes represent terms/bioentities/concepts being connected by relationship edges; edge weights might represent confidence for these semantic connections.This chapter provides a review of current methods for co-occurrence analysis, focusing on data storage, analysis, and representation. We highlight scenarios of these approaches implemented by useful tools for information extraction and knowledge inference in the field of systems biology. We illustrate the practical utility of two online resources providing services of this type-namely, STRING and BioTextQuest-concluding with a discussion of current challenges and future perspectives in the field.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24788262     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0709-0_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  9 in total

Review 1.  Depicting Developing Trend and Core Knowledge of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.

Authors:  Liting Zhao; Jinfei Li; Lemeng Feng; Cheng Zhang; Wulong Zhang; Chao Wang; Ye He; Dan Wen; Weitao Song
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Multiple kernels learning-based biological entity relationship extraction method.

Authors:  Xu Dongliang; Pan Jingchang; Wang Bailing
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2017-09-20

3.  The primary total knee arthroplasty: a global analysis.

Authors:  Jiaxiang Gao; Dan Xing; Shengjie Dong; Jianhao Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Depicting developing trend and core knowledge of hip fracture research: a bibliometric and visualised analysis.

Authors:  Guanrong Peng; Zhenhua Guan; Zhangrong Zhong; Jianhao Lin; Yunfei Hou; Jiaxiang Gao; Wenqun Rao; Xianyun Yuan; Jiusheng Guo; Xiaohua Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  The speed of information propagation in the scientific network distorts biomedical research.

Authors:  Raul Rodriguez-Esteban
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Worldwide Research Trends on Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2004-2020): Suggestions for Researchers.

Authors:  Pin Deng; Hongshuo Shi; Xuyue Pan; Huan Liang; Shulong Wang; Junde Wu; Wei Zhang; Fasen Huang; Xiaojie Sun; Hanjie Zhu; Zhaojun Chen
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 7.  Visualizing genome and systems biology: technologies, tools, implementation techniques and trends, past, present and future.

Authors:  Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Dimitris Malliarakis; Nikolas Papanikolaou; Theodosis Theodosiou; Anton J Enright; Ioannis Iliopoulos
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  Soft document clustering using a novel graph covering approach.

Authors:  Jens Dörpinghaus; Sebastian Schaaf; Marc Jacobs
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 9.  A Guide to Conquer the Biological Network Era Using Graph Theory.

Authors:  Mikaela Koutrouli; Evangelos Karatzas; David Paez-Espino; Georgios A Pavlopoulos
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.