Literature DB >> 24787384

Long-term outcome of foveolar internal limiting membrane nonpeeling for myopic traction maculopathy.

Tzyy-Chang Ho1, Chung-May Yang, Jen-Shang Huang, Chang-Hao Yang, Po-Ting Yeh, Ta-Ching Chen, Allen Ho, Muh-Shy Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term results of a novel technique to preserve the foveolar cone without peeling off the foveolar internal limiting membrane (ILM) during myopic traction maculopathy surgery.
METHODS: Nineteen patients (19 eyes) were retrospectively studied and divided into 2 groups by the extent of ILM peeled and followed for more than 3 years. Group 1: foveolar ILM nonpeeling group (FN) (12 eyes) and Group 2: total peeling of foveal ILM group (TP) (7 eyes). A donut-shaped ILM was peeled off, leaving a 400-μm diameter ILM over foveola with a sharp margin in FN group.
RESULTS: Macular hole was developed in 2 of the 7 eyes (28.6%) in the TP group and none in the FN group. Long-term central fovea thickness thinning and decrease of vision were found in the TP group, but not in the FN group (P < 0.05). Inner segment/outer segment line recovered in 75% of the 12 eyes in the FN group, but in only 14.3% of the 7 eyes in the TP group.
CONCLUSION: Preservation of the foveolar cone by foveola nonpeeling surgery correlates with better anatomical and visual results than total peel, prevents long-term foveolar retinal thinning, and successfully saves the fovea from macular hole formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24787384     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  12 in total

1.  Long-term surgical outcomes of multiple parfoveolar curvilinear internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.

Authors:  Tian Tian; Haiying Jin; Qi Zhang; Xiang Zhang; Hongtao Zhang; Peiquan Zhao
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy.

Authors:  Masanori Iwasaki; Hirotomo Miyamoto; Utako Okushiba; Hiroko Imaizumi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Fovea sparing versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guohai Chen; Sihong Mao; Yuhua Tong; Fangzheng Jiang; Jiasong Yang; Wensheng Li
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  FOVEA-SPARING VERSUS COMPLETE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN VITRECTOMY FOR VITREOMACULAR INTERFACE DISEASES: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuelin Wang; Xinyu Zhao; Wenfei Zhang; Jingyuan Yang; Youxin Chen
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Combined fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with internal limiting membrane flap technique for progressive myopic traction maculopathy.

Authors:  Jih-Pin Lin; Chung-May Yang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Prognostic Factors Related with Surgical Outcome of Vitrectomy in Myopic Traction Maculopathy.

Authors:  Chung Young Kim; Min Seok Kim; Kyoung Lae Kim; Se Joon Woo; Kyu Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02

7.  Foveal-Sparing ILM Peeling in a Case with Vitreomacular Traction and Foveal Detachment.

Authors:  Christoph Leisser; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-12

8.  Efficiency comparison with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and complete internal limiting membrane peeling for treating myopic traction maculopathy.

Authors:  Wen-Jian Xin; Ji-Ze Jiang; Lei-Bing Ji; Wen-Juan Lv; Yong-Xin Gu; Yun Xiao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Fovea sparing internal limiting membrane peeling using multiple parafoveal curvilinear peels for myopic foveoschisis: technique and outcome.

Authors:  Haiying Jin; Qi Zhang; Peiquan Zhao
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique.

Authors:  Yen-Chih Chen; San-Ni Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.