Literature DB >> 24787312

A randomized clinical trial comparing reported and measured wear rates in clubfoot bracing using a novel pressure sensor.

Aaron Morgenstein1, Rebecca Davis, Vishwas Talwalkar, Henry Iwinski, Janet Walker, Todd A Milbrandt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of clubfoot by the Ponseti method requires the utilization of a foot abduction orthosis (FAO) after manipulation and casting. Adherence to this protocol, specifically FAO wear rates, has been postulated to improve treatment outcomes. Our hypothesis was that caregiver-reported wear rates were significantly less than actual wear rates in these braces.
METHODS: A randomized prospective study of 67 children, aged 0 to 3 years old with idiopathic clubfoot, treated using the Ponseti technique for idiopathic clubfoot, was undertaken after IRB approval. Participants were randomized into 3 groups: a functioning pressure-based sensor (group FPS) attached to the FAO (21 patients), a nonfunctioning sensor (NFPS group) attached to the FAO (24 patients), or no sensor (NS group) (22 patients). All caregivers filled out a diary of subjective wear rates. Reported and actual wear rates were recorded as a percentage of the entire day and compared.
RESULTS: In the FPS group, the average actual wear rate for months 1, 2, and 3 were 91.7% (15 patients; 72.7% to 97.0%), 86.8% (9 patients; 60.5% to 96.3%), and 77.1% (7 patients; 52.6% to 95.8%), respectively. The average self-reported wear rate in the FPS group in months 1, 2, and 3 were 94.9% (13 patients; 93.1% to 98.7%), 95.6% (10 patients; 92.3% to 99.4%), and 94.8% (11 patients; 82.8% to 99.6%), respectively. The most predictive factor in determining a patient's decrease in the overall wear rate was a drop in the wear rate between months 1 and 2 (P<0.001). The reported wear rates were not statistically different between any of the 3 groups (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: By using a novel method of pressure measurement, which documented FAO wear, we have shown a significant decline in wear rates from months 1 to 3. These actual FAO wear rates did not match their reported rates, thus putting into question previous assumptions about reported brace compliance. The largest drop in wear rates occurred from months 2 to 3. This study provides the first objective measurement of FAO brace wear in patients undergoing the Ponseti method of treatment. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24787312     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  6 in total

Review 1.  What is new in idiopathic clubfoot?

Authors:  Ryan M O'Shea; Coleen S Sabatini
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

2.  Letter to the Editor Brace compliance in clubfoot: Clinical signs.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Shobhit Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-01-28

3.  Sensor based braces: Challenges ahead.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-22

4.  Bracing in clubfoot: do we know enough?

Authors:  C Alves
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Development of a functional prototype of a SMART (Sensor-integrated for Monitoring And Remote Tracking) foot abduction brace for clubfoot treatment: a pre-clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Alaric Aroojis; Tapas Pandey; Ajay Dusa; Arun G Krishnan; Rupesh Ghyar; Bhallamudi Ravi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Measuring Foot Abduction Brace Wear Time Using a Single 3-Axis Accelerometer.

Authors:  Benjamin Griffiths; Natan Silver; Malcolm H Granat; Ehud Lebel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.