Literature DB >> 24787130

Influence of reverse torque values in abutments with or without internal hexagon indexes.

Daiane Cerutti-Kopplin1, Dimas João Rodrigues Neto2, Accácio Lins do Valle3, Jefferson Ricardo Pereira4.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The mechanical stability of the implant-abutment connection is of fundamental importance for successful implant-supported restorations. Therefore, understanding removal torque values is essential.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reverse torque values of indexed and nonindexed abutments of the Morse Taper system.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve Morse taper implants with their respective abutments were divided into 2 groups (n=6): group NI, nonindexed abutments; and group IN, indexed abutments. Each abutment received a sequence of 2 consecutive torques for insertion (15 Ncm) at an interval of 10 minutes, and 1 reverse torque, all measured with a digital torque wrench. The Student t test with a 5% significance level was used to evaluate the data.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in reverse torque values between nonindexed and indexed abutments (P=.57). When comparing insertion torque and reverse torque values between the groups, group NI presented a mean torque loosening percentage of 8% (P=.013), whereas group IN presented a loosening of 15.33% (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: The use of indexed abutments for the Morse taper system presented similar biomechanical stability when compared with nonindexed abutments, both with a significant reduction in reverse torque values.
Copyright © 2014 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24787130     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  Reverse torque evaluation in indexed and nonindexed abutments of Morse Taper implants in a mechanical fatigue test.

Authors:  Caio Marques Martins; Elimário Venturin Ramos; Simone Kreve; Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho; Aline Batista Gonçalves Franco; Luís Guilherme Scavone de Macedo; Alecsandro de Moura Silva; Sérgio Candido Dias
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

2.  Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.

Authors:  Yuseung Yi; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Seong-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Evaluation of reverse torque values and failure loads of three different abutment designs with internal connections.

Authors:  Saied Nokar; Habib Hajimiragha; Leyla Sadighpour; Azam Sadat Mostafavi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Tao Zhang; Kang-Jie Cheng; Fan Yang; Lin-Hong Wang; Yun-Feng Liu; Russell Wang; Yun-Fang Chen; Yu-de Ding
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  The compressive strength of implant-abutment complex with different connection designs.

Authors:  Hsien-Ching Hung; Chiung-Shing Huang; Yu-Hwa Pan
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Effect of Implant Platform Connection and Abutment Material on Removal Torque and Implant Hexagon Plastic Deformation.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique de Souza Pereira; Marina Amaral; Kusai Baroudi; Rafael Pino Vitti; Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Laís Regiane da Silva-Concílio
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.