Literature DB >> 24787104

For-profit hospital ownership status and use of brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

Sounok Sen1, Pamela R Soulos2, Jeph Herrin3, Kenneth B Roberts4, James B Yu4, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski5, Joseph S Ross6, Harlan M Krumholz7, Cary P Gross8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relationship between operative care for breast cancer at for-profit hospitals and subsequent use of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Among Medicare beneficiaries, we examined whether hospital ownership status is associated with the use of breast brachytherapy--a newer and more expensive modality--as well as overall RT.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of female Medicare beneficiaries who received breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer in 2008 and 2009. We assessed the relationship between hospital ownership and receipt of brachytherapy or overall RT by using hierarchical generalized linear models.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 35,118 women, 8.0% of whom had breast-conserving operations at for-profit hospitals. Among patients who received RT, those who underwent operation at for-profit hospitals were more likely to receive brachytherapy (20.2%) than patients treated at not-for-profit hospitals (15.2%; odds ratio [OR] for for-profit versus not-for-profit: 1.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.23-1.84; P < .001). Among women aged 66-79 years, there was no relationship between hospital ownership status and overall use of RT. Among women ages 80-94 years of age--the group least likely to benefit from RT due to shorter life expectancy--undergoing breast-conserving operations at a for-profit hospital was associated with greater overall use of RT (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.03-1.45, P = .03) and brachytherapy use (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.18-2.34, P = .003).
CONCLUSION: Operative care at for-profit hospitals was associated with increased use of the newer and more expensive RT modality, brachytherapy. Among the oldest women who are least likely to benefit from RT, operative care at a for-profit hospital was associated with greater overall use of RT, with this difference largely driven by the use of brachytherapy.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24787104      PMCID: PMC4008843          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  42 in total

1.  Academic health centers on the front lines: survival strategies in highly competitive markets.

Authors:  D Blumenthal; J S Weissman; P F Griner
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  High and rising health care costs. Part 2: technologic innovation.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Advertising by academic medical centers.

Authors:  Robin J Larson; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

4.  Reimbursement policy and androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vahakn B Shahinian; Yong-Fang Kuo; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Association between treatment with brachytherapy vs whole-breast irradiation and subsequent mastectomy, complications, and survival among older women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Ying Xu; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Jing Jiang; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effectiveness of radiation therapy for older women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Cary P Gross; Grace L Smith; Deron H Galusha; Justin E Bekelman; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Long-term clinical and cosmetic outcomes after breast conservation treatment for women with early-stage breast carcinoma according to the type of breast boost.

Authors:  Christine E Hill-Kayser; David Chacko; Wei-Ting Hwang; Neha Vapiwala; Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Predictors of breast conservation therapy: size is not all that matters.

Authors:  Karen Hiotis; Wei Ye; Richard Sposto; Kristin A Skinner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patterns of use and short-term complications of breast brachytherapy in the national medicare population from 2008-2009.

Authors:  Carolyn J Presley; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Kenneth B Roberts; James B Yu; Brigid Killelea; Beth-Ann Lesnikoski; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Dialysis facility ownership and epoetin dosing in patients receiving hemodialysis.

Authors:  Mae Thamer; Yi Zhang; James Kaufman; Dennis Cotter; Fan Dong; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Physician's peer exposure and the adoption of a new cancer treatment modality.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Pamela R Soulos; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Within Appalachia--The Role of For-Profit Hospitals.

Authors:  Eric E Seiber; Fabian Camacho; Muhammad Fazal Zeeshan; Teresa T Kern; Steven T Fleming
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.333

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.