Literature DB >> 24786647

Size-dependent strength of dental adhesive systems.

Marc Campillo-Funollet1, Gary F Dargush2, Richard A VanSlooten2, Joseph C Mollendorf2, Hyeongil Kim3, Steven R Makowka2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explain the influence of peripheral interface stress singularities on the testing of tensile bond strength. The relationships between these theoretically predicted singularities and the effect of specimen size on the measured bond strength are evaluated.
METHODS: Finite element method (FEM) and boundary element method (BEM) analyses of microtensile bond strength test specimens were performed and the presence of localized high stress concentrations and singularities was analyzed. The specimen size effect predicted by the models was compared to previously published experimental data.
RESULTS: FEM analysis of single-material trimmed hour-glass versus cast cylindrical specimens showed different theoretical stress distributions, with the dumbbell or cylindrical specimens showing a more homogeneous distribution of the stress on the critical symmetry plane. For multi-material specimens, mathematical singularities at the free edge of the bonded interface posed a computational challenge that resulted in mesh-dependence in the standard FEM analysis. A specialized weighted-traction BEM analysis, designed to eliminate mesh-dependence by capturing the effect of the singularity, predicted a specimen size effect that corresponds to that published previously in the literature. SIGNIFICANCE: The results presented here further support the attention to specimen dimensions that has already broadened the empirical use of the microtensile test methods. FEM and BEM analyses that identify stress concentrations and especially marginal stress singularities must be accounted for in reliable bonding strength assessments. Size-dependent strength variations generally attributed to the effects of flaw distributions throughout the interfacial region are not as relevant as the presence of singularities at bonded joint boundaries - as revealed by both FEM and BEM analyses, when interpreted from a generalized fracture mechanics perspective. Furthermore, this size-dependence must be considered when evaluating or designing dental adhesive systems.
Copyright © 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Adhesion; Boundary element method; Finite element method; Generalized fracture mechanics; Mesh dependence; Size-dependent behavior; Stress singularities; Tensile bond strength

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24786647     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  2 in total

1.  Dentin-composite bond strength measurement using the Brazilian disk test.

Authors:  Carola A Carrera; Yung-Chung Chen; Yuping Li; Joel Rudney; Conrado Aparicio; Alex Fok
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques.

Authors:  Ahmed M Ismail; Christoph Bourauel; Ahmed ElBanna; Tarek Salah Eldin
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.