Literature DB >> 24786553

Implantation and persistence of yeast inoculum in Pinot noir fermentations at three Canadian wineries.

Jessica N Lange1, Erin Faasse1, Mansak Tantikachornkiat1, Frida S Gustafsson1, Liz C Halvorsen1, Amy Kluftinger1, David Ledderhof2, Daniel M Durall3.   

Abstract

Inoculated fermentations are practiced in most wine regions of the world. This type of fermentation involves adding a commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain as an inoculant. It is often assumed that the inoculant maintains dominance throughout the fermentation; however, sometimes commercial or indigenous yeasts, which were not intentionally added, end up as the dominant yeast in the winery fermentation. The aim of this study was to compare implantation/persistence of inoculants among three Canadian wineries (Quails' Gate, Cedar Creek, and Road 13 wineries). In 2010, three inoculated fermentation tanks at each of three wineries were sampled at four stages of fermentation (pre-inoculation, early, mid, and end). In addition, results from the end stage of fermentation, from two of the three wineries, were compared among different vintages (resulting in a 4-year comparison at Quails' Gate winery and a 2-year comparison at Cedar Creek winery). Strains of S. cerevisiae were discriminated by microsatellite analysis and identified using commercial microsatellite databases, whereas DNA sequencing was used to identify non-Saccharomyces. The percent implantation/persistence of the inoculum was significantly lower at Quails' Gate and Cedar Creek wineries as compared with the Road 13 winery in the 2010 vintage. Relatively low persistence of the inoculum at Quails' Gate winery was also found in the 2009 vintage, but low values were not found at Quails' Gate winery in 2011 and 2012 or at Cedar Creek winery in 2012. In all tanks having <80% relative abundance of the inoculant, the commercial strain (Lalvin ICV-D254®/Fermol® Premier Cru) was the dominant or co-dominant yeast. Our findings highlight year-to-year variation in inoculum implantation/persistence and the idea that unless strain typing of S. cerevisiae is conducted at the winery, there are no obvious fermentation factors that would indicate a relatively low inoculum implantation/persistence.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commercial inoculum; Microsatellite analysis; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Strain typing; Winery fermentations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24786553     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  4 in total

1.  Effect of sulfite addition and pied de cuve inoculation on the microbial communities and sensory profiles of Chardonnay wines: dominance of indigenous Saccharomyces uvarum at a commercial winery.

Authors:  Sydney C Morgan; Garrett C McCarthy; Brittany S Watters; Mansak Tantikachornkiat; Ieva Zigg; Margaret A Cliff; Daniel M Durall
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  The impact of active dry yeasts in commercial wineries from the Denomination of Origen "Vinos de Madrid", Spain.

Authors:  M Gil-Díaz; E Valero; J M Cabellos; M García; T Arroyo
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Development and use of a quantum dot probe to track multiple yeast strains in mixed culture.

Authors:  Frida S Gustafsson; Matthew D Whiteside; Vladimir Jiranek; Daniel M Durall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Past and Future of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts: From Spoilage Microorganisms to Biotechnological Tools for Improving Wine Aroma Complexity.

Authors:  Beatriz Padilla; José V Gil; Paloma Manzanares
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.