Literature DB >> 24786475

Reasons for withdrawing belief in vivid autobiographical memories.

Alan Scoboria1, Chantal Boucher, Giuliana Mazzoni.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that many people hold personal memories for events that they no longer believe occurred. This study examines the reasons that people provide for choosing to reduce autobiographical belief in vividly recollected autobiographical memories. A body of non-believed memories provided by 374 individuals was reviewed to develop a qualitatively derived categorisation system. The final scheme consisted of 8 major categories (in descending order of mention): social feedback, event plausibility, alternative attributions, general memory beliefs, internal event features, consistency with external evidence, views of self/others, personal motivation and numerous sub-categories. Independent raters coded the reports and judged the primary reason that each person provided for withdrawing belief. The nature of each category, frequency of category endorsement, category overlap and phenomenological ratings are presented, following which links to related literature and implications are discussed. This study documents that a wide variety of recollective and non-recollective sources of information influence decision-making about the occurrence of autobiographical events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autobiographical belief; Autobiographical memory; Decision making; Non-believed memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24786475     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.910530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  2 in total

1.  Make it real: Belief in occurrence within episodic future thought.

Authors:  Alexandra Ernst; Arnaud D'Argembeau
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

2.  Defending and reducing belief in memories: An experimental laboratory analogue.

Authors:  Alan Scoboria; Henry Otgaar; Giuliana Mazzoni
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.