Literature DB >> 24786316

Audit of the job satisfaction levels of the UK radiography and physics workforce in UK radiotherapy centres 2012.

D Hutton1, C Beardmore, I Patel, J Massey, H Wong, H Probst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Workforce planning reports identify a staff shortfall that jeopardizes the ability of UK radiotherapy centres to meet future demands. Obtaining an understanding of the work experiences of radiotherapy professionals will support the development of strategies to increase job satisfaction, productivity and effectiveness.
METHODS: A quantitative survey assessed job satisfaction, attitudes to incident reporting, stress and burnout, opportunities for professional development, workload, retention and turnover. Clinical oncologists were not included, as the Royal College of Radiologists, London, UK, had recently assessed their members' satisfaction. All questions were taken from validated instruments or adapted from the "UK National Health Service Staff Survey".
RESULTS: The survey yielded 658 completed responses (approximately 16% response rate), from public and private sectors. Over a third (36%) of respondents were classified as satisfied for job satisfaction with 11% dissatisfied and the remaining 53% ambivalent. A significant proportion of clinical staff (37.5%) report high emotional exhaustion. Presenteeism was an issue with 42.4% attending work despite feeling unable to fulfil their role.
CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy professionals are prone to the effects of compassion fatigue and burnout. Attention must be paid to workload and its impact on practitioners' job satisfaction. Professional development that is supported and informed by a performance development review is a simple and effective means of enhancing satisfaction. Individuals have a responsibility to themselves and their colleagues as their behaviours and attitudes influence job satisfaction. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This work identifies areas for future research to enhance the professional resilience of practitioners, in order to provide high-quality treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24786316      PMCID: PMC4075580          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

1.  The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.

Authors:  R Curtin; S Presser; E Singer
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Illuminative evaluation: evaluating clinical supervision on its performance rather than the applause.

Authors:  G Sloan; H Watson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey.

Authors:  S Keeter; C Miller; A Kohut; R M Groves; S Presser
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

4.  Burnout in therapy radiographers in the UK.

Authors:  H Probst; S Griffiths; R Adams; C Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Professional development opportunities in changing times.

Authors:  Bob Price
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2007 Feb 28-Mar 6

6.  Stress at work for the clinical oncologist.

Authors:  A J Ramirez; J Graham; M A Richards; A R Timothy
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover.

Authors:  T A Wright; R Cropanzano
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1998-06

8.  Nonresponse bias in a survey of patient perceptions of hospital care.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger; Eric Chamot; Patrick A Bovier
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Information needs in terminal illness.

Authors:  J S Kutner; J F Steiner; K K Corbett; D W Jahnigen; P L Barton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Where do We Go from Here? Nonresponse and Social Measurement.

Authors:  Douglas S Massey; Roger Tourangeau
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2013-01
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: impact on the radiography profession.

Authors:  Maryann Hardy; Hugh Harvey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Burnout among house officers in Myanmar: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kyaw San Lin; Thant Zaw; Win Min Oo; Pa Pa Soe
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-20

3.  An extensive survey of radiographers from the Middle East and India on artificial intelligence integration in radiology practice.

Authors:  Mohamed M Abuzaid; Wiam Elshami; Jonathan McConnell; H O Tekin
Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)       Date:  2021-08-06

4.  Relationship between labour force satisfaction, wages and retention within the UK National Health Service: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kweku Andrew Ampadu Bimpong; Ausaf Khan; Robert Slight; Clare L Tolley; Sarah P Slight
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation.

Authors:  Bruno Vieira; Derya Demirtas; Jeroen B van de Kamer; Erwin W Hans; Wim van Harten
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.