| Literature DB >> 24786314 |
Nina Holling1, Cinzia Dedi, Caroline E Jones, Joseph A Hawthorne, Geoffrey W Hanlon, Jonathan P Salvage, Bhavik A Patel, Lara M Barnes, Brian V Jones.
Abstract
Proteus mirabilis is a common cause of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and frequently leads to blockage of catheters due to crystalline biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has proven to be a valuable tool in the study of these unusual biofilms, but entails laborious sample preparation that can introduce artefacts, undermining the investigation of biofilm development. In contrast, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) permits imaging of unprocessed, fully hydrated samples, which may provide much insight into the development of P. mirabilis biofilms. Here, we evaluate the utility of ESEM for the study of P. mirabilis crystalline biofilms in situ, on urinary catheters. In doing so, we compare this to commonly used conventional SEM approaches for sample preparation and imaging. Overall, ESEM provided excellent resolution of biofilms formed on urinary catheters and revealed structures not observed in standard SEM imaging or previously described in other studies of these biofilms. In addition, we show that energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) may be employed in conjunction with ESEM to provide information regarding the elemental composition of crystalline structures and demonstrate the potential for ESEM in combination with EDS to constitute a useful tool in exploring the mechanisms underpinning crystalline biofilm formation.Entities:
Keywords: Proteus mirabilis; catheter-associated urinary tract infection; crystalline biofilm; environmental scanning electron microscopy
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24786314 PMCID: PMC4262002 DOI: 10.1111/1574-6968.12451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Lett ISSN: 0378-1097 Impact factor: 2.742
Fig 1Comparison of conventional SEM approaches and ESEM for observation of Proteus mirabilis crystalline biofilms. Images show representative regions of mature biofilms developed on all-silicone Foley catheters using in vitro bladder models supplied with a standardised AU medium. (a, b) Images obtained following conventional processing of catheter sections with glutaraldehyde fixation followed by ethanol dehydration and viewing of uncoated samples using VP-SEM, or platinum-coated samples at high magnification using HV-SEM. Arrows indicate regions in HV-SEM images where individual cells are visible (blue arrows). (c) Images obtained from observation of unprocessed biofilms with ESEM. Arrows indicate examples of distinct crystal types designated as either type 1 (green arrows; large electron dense) or type 2 (orange arrows; ‘sheet-like’ structures). Images represent examples from analysis of crystalline biofilms developed in three replicate experiments and derived from distinct catheter biofilms. Images are representative of a minimum of 15 fields of view for each SEM method.
Fig 2Analysis of crystalline biofilm composition using ESEM and EDS. (a) ESEM images showing regions of biofilms, and crystalline structures subject to EDS analysis. Symbols on images denote structures or regions subject to EDS analysis as described in the associated legend. Blue symbols and boxed regions (1–5) show areas of the bulk biofilm matrix from which EDS spectra were derived; green symbols and crosses (i–v) identify type 1 crystal structures from which EDS spectra were derived; orange symbols and crosses (a–e) identify type 2 crystal structures from which EDS spectra were derived. Images were obtained from distinct catheter sections. Cps/Ev: counts per second per electron-volt, keV: kilo-electron-volt. (b) Examples of EDS spectra derived from distinct crystalline structures observed within Proteus mirabilis biofilms. Example spectra were derived from regions or structures indicated by associated symbols of corresponding number/letter and on images in part A. (c) Average relative abundance profile of elements detected in EDS spectra derived from the main features of crystalline biofilms observed in ESEM imaging (bulk matrix 1–5, crystal type 1 i–v and crystal type 2 a–e). For each element, data are presented as a proportion of all elements detected in different structures, based on average cps/Ev counts from all spectra analysed.
Fig 3Evaluation of ESEM:ESD for comparative analysis of crystalline biofilm formation by Proteus mirabilis. Ten-hour-old biofilms formed on urinary catheters by the wild-type strain B4 and the derivative mini-Tn5 mutant NHBFF9 were compared using ESEM and EDS. (a) Example images of wild-type and mutant biofilms. (b) Results of EDS analysis of biofilms showing average cps/Ev counts of elements associated with crystal formation and biofilm mineralisation in wild-type and NHBFF9 mutant biofilms. (c) Comparison of biofilm formation between the wild-type and mutant NHBFF9 on representative sections of urinary catheter, using a modified crystal violet assay. The absorbance of crystal violet solutions obtained after staining of biofilms on catheter sections and elution of retained stain were used as a measure of biofilm formation. (d) Comparison of levels of encrustation, generated by the wild-type and mutant NHBFF9, by flame photometric quantification of calcium. In this case, the same catheter sections analysed using ESEM:EDS were subsequently processed for measurement of calcium by this method. For all charts, error bars show standard error of the mean, and symbols above bars indicate statistically significant differences between the wild type and mutant (*P ≤ 0.05,**P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001). All data were derived from analysis of crystalline biofilms developed in three independent bladder model experiments, with three randomly selected whole fields of view scanned per catheter section for EDS (n = 9 fields of view in total).