Literature DB >> 24785928

Effect of bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance on the craniofacial structures using finite element analysis.

Seong Cheon Lee1, Jae Hyun Park2, Mohamed Bayome3, Ki Beom Kim4, Eustaquio A Araujo5, Yoon-Ah Kook6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze stress distribution and displacement of the craniofacial structures resulting from bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance using finite element analysis.
METHODS: Five designs of rapid maxillary expanders were made: a tooth-borne hyrax expander (type A); a bone-borne expander (type B); and 3 bone-borne surgically assisted modalities: separation of the midpalatal suture (type C), added separation of the pterygomaxillary sutures (type D), and added LeFort I corticotomy (type E). The geometric nonlinear theory was applied to evaluate the Von Mises stress distribution and displacement.
RESULTS: The surgical types C, D, and E demonstrated more transverse movement than did the nonsurgical types A and B. The amounts of expansion were greater in the posterior teeth in types A and B, but in types C, D, and E, the amounts of expansion were greater in the anterior teeth. At the midpalatal suture, the nonsurgical types showed more anterior expansion than did the posterior region, and higher stresses than with the surgical types. Type B showed the highest stresses at the infraorbital margin, anterior and posterior nasal spines, maxillary tuberosity, and pterygoid plate and hamulus.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3 surgical models showed similar amounts of stress and displacement along the teeth, midpalatal sutures, and craniofacial sutures. Therefore, when using a bone-borne rapid maxillary expander in an adult, it is recommended to assist it with midpalatal suture separation, which requires minimal surgical intervention.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785928     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Effects of monocortical and bicortical mini-implant anchorage on bone-borne palatal expansion using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Won Moon; Christine Hong
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Evaluation of Initial Stress Distribution and Displacement Pattern of Craniofacial Structures with 3 Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliance Models: A 3-dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Merve Sucu; Berza Yilmaz; Sabri İlhan Ramoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  Influence of changing various parameters in miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Soungjun Yoon; Dong-Yul Lee; Seok-Ki Jung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Reader's Forum.

Authors:  Mohammed Alfaifi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  READER'S FORUM.

Authors:  Seo-Rin Jeong; Hyein Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Geometry of anchoring miniscrew in the lateral palate that support a tissue bone borne maxillary expander affects neighboring root damage.

Authors:  Song Hee Oh; Sae Rom Lee; Jin-Young Choi; Hyo-Won Ahn; Seong-Hun Kim; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Displacement and stress distribution of the craniomaxillofacial complex under different surgical conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis of fracture mechanics.

Authors:  Junjie Chen; Yuhan Xu; Chengri Li; Lingling Zhang; Fang Yi; Yanqin Lu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Sphenoid bone changes in rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Lucas S Stepanko; Manuel O Lagravère
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Midpalatal suture: evaluation of the morphological maturation stages via bone density.

Authors:  Dani Abo Samra; Rania Hadad
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  The difference of stress distribution of maxillary expansion using rapid maxillary expander (RME) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE)-a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Nathania Hartono; Benny M Soegiharto; Retno Widayati
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.750

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.