Literature DB >> 24785488

The minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: a reproducible rational framework for decision making in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.

Praveen V Mummaneni1, Christopher I Shaffrey, Lawrence G Lenke, Paul Park, Michael Y Wang, Frank La Marca, Justin S Smith, Gregory M Mundis, David O Okonkwo, Bertrand Moal, Richard G Fessler, Neel Anand, Juan S Uribe, Adam S Kanter, Behrooz Akbarnia, Kai-Ming G Fu.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an alternative to open deformity surgery for the treatment of patients with adult spinal deformity. However, at this time MIS techniques are not as versatile as open deformity techniques, and MIS techniques have been reported to result in suboptimal sagittal plane correction or pseudarthrosis when used for severe deformities. The minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery (MISDEF) algorithm was created to provide a framework for rational decision making for surgeons who are considering MIS versus open spine surgery.
METHODS: A team of experienced spinal deformity surgeons developed the MISDEF algorithm that incorporates a patient's preoperative radiographic parameters and leads to one of 3 general plans ranging from MIS direct or indirect decompression to open deformity surgery with osteotomies. The authors surveyed fellowship-trained spine surgeons experienced with spinal deformity surgery to validate the algorithm using a set of 20 cases to establish interobserver reliability. They then resurveyed the same surgeons 2 months later with the same cases presented in a different sequence to establish intraobserver reliability. Responses were collected and tabulated. Fleiss' analysis was performed using MATLAB software.
RESULTS: Over a 3-month period, 11 surgeons completed the surveys. Responses for MISDEF algorithm case review demonstrated an interobserver kappa of 0.58 for the first round of surveys and an interobserver kappa of 0.69 for the second round of surveys, consistent with substantial agreement. In at least 10 cases there was perfect agreement between the reviewing surgeons. The mean intraobserver kappa for the 2 surveys was 0.86 ± 0.15 (± SD) and ranged from 0.62 to 1.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the MISDEF algorithm provides consistent and straightforward guidance for surgeons who are considering either an MIS or an open approach for the treatment of patients with adult spinal deformity. The MISDEF algorithm was found to have substantial inter- and intraobserver agreement. Although further studies are needed, the application of this algorithm could provide a platform for surgeons to achieve the desired goals of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785488     DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.FOCUS1413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  26 in total

1.  Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.

Authors:  Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adult spinal deformity: effectiveness of interbody lordotic cages to restore disc angle and spino-pelvic parameters through completely mini-invasive trans-psoas and hybrid approach.

Authors:  Giuseppe Barone; Laura Scaramuzzo; Antonino Zagra; Fabrizio Giudici; Andrea Perna; Luca Proietti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Role of minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity in preventing complications.

Authors:  Chun-Po Yen; Yusef I Mosley; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

5.  One-step (standard) versus two-step surgical approach in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior spinal fusion: Which is better?

Authors:  Norman Ramirez; Pablo Valentin; Manuel García-Cartagena; Solais Samalot; Ivan Iriarte
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-05-13

Review 6.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Jennifer Shue; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

7.  Prepsoas oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion in deformity surgery.

Authors:  Catherine Miller; Puneet Gulati; Deepak Bandlish; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 8.  State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Kai-Ming Fu; Juan S Uribe; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-08-06

9.  The Influence of Lordotic cages on creating Sagittal Balance in the CMIS treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Ryan B Cohen; Jason Cohen; Babak Kahndehroo; Sheila Kahwaty; Eli Baron
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-30

10.  Minimal invasive surgical algorithm for revision lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  Yu Chao Lee; Robert Lee
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.