Literature DB >> 24785367

The impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on recovery after intensive, muscle damaging, maximal speed training in professional team sports players.

Tom Taylor1, Daniel J West2, Glyn Howatson2, Chris Jones3, Richard M Bracken3, Thomas D Love3, Christian J Cook4, Eamon Swift5, Julien S Baker6, Liam P Kilduff7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: During congested fixture periods in team sports, limited recovery time and increased travel hinder the implementation of many recovery strategies; thus alternative methods are required. We examined the impact of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation device on 24-h recovery from an intensive training session in professional players.
DESIGN: Twenty-eight professional rugby and football academy players completed this randomised and counter-balanced study, on 2 occasions, separated by 7 days.
METHODS: After baseline perceived soreness, blood (lactate and creatine kinase) and saliva (testosterone and cortisol) samples were collected, players completed a standardised warm-up and baseline countermovement jumps (jump height). Players then completed 60 m × 50 m maximal sprints, with 5 min recovery between efforts. After completing the sprint session, players wore a neuromuscular electrical stimulation device or remained in normal attire (CON) for 8 h. All measures were repeated immediately, 2 and 24-h post-sprint.
RESULTS: Player jump height was reduced from baseline at all time points under both conditions; however, at 24-h neuromuscular electrical stimulation was significantly more recovered (mean±SD; neuromuscular electrical stimulation -3.2±3.2 vs. CON -7.2±3.7%; P<0.001). Creatine kinase concentrations increased at all time points under both conditions, but at 24-h was lower under neuromuscular electrical stimulation (P<0.001). At 24-h, perceived soreness was significantly lower under neuromuscular electrical stimulation, when compared to CON (P=0.02). There was no effect of condition on blood lactate, or saliva testosterone and cortisol responses (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves recovery from intensive training in professional team sports players. This strategy offers an easily applied recovery strategy which may have particular application during sleep and travel.
Copyright © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortisol; Creatine kinase; Performance; Testosterone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785367     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  6 in total

1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation via the peroneal nerve is superior to graduated compression socks in reducing perceived muscle soreness following intense intermittent endurance exercise.

Authors:  Richard A Ferguson; Matthew J Dodd; Victoria R Paley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Changes in Salivary Levels of Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, and Aspartate Aminotransferase after Playing Rugby Sevens: The Influence of Gender.

Authors:  Álvaro González Fernández; Jose Enrique de la Rubia Ortí; Lorena Franco-Martinez; Jose Joaquín Ceron; Gonzalo Mariscal; Carlos Barrios
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Effects of electrode size and placement on comfort and efficiency during low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles.

Authors:  J Flodin; R Juthberg; P W Ackermann
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-16

4.  Comparison of Different Recovery Strategies After High-Intensity Functional Training: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rafael Martínez-Gómez; Pedro L Valenzuela; Alejandro Lucia; David Barranco-Gil
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Training Load and Fatigue Marker Associations with Injury and Illness: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; Peter C Griffiths; Stephen D Mellalieu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Is Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation a Tool for Recovery after a Water Rescue? A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards.

Authors:  Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Alicia González-Represas; Ezequiel Rey; Alicia Martínez-Rodríguez; Anton Kalén; Olga Marques; Luís Rama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.