Literature DB >> 24785323

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience and predictors of extent of resection.

Kyle Juraschka1, Osaama H Khan, Bruno L Godoy, Eric Monsalves, Alexandra Kilian, Boris Krischek, Aisha Ghare, Allan Vescan, Fred Gentili, Gelareh Zadeh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECT.: While the use of endoscopic approaches has become increasingly accepted in the resection of pituitary adenomas, limited evidence exists regarding the success of this technique for patients with large and giant pituitary adenomas. This study reviews the outcomes of a large cohort of patients with large and giant pituitary adenomas who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery at the authors' institution and focuses on identifying factors that can predict extent of resection and hence aid in developing guidelines and indications for the use of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery versus open craniotomy approaches to large and giant pituitary adenomas.
METHODS: The authors reviewed 487 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of sellar masses. From this group, 73 consecutive patients with large and giant pituitary adenomas (defined as maximum diameter ≥ 3 cm and tumor volume ≥ 10 cm(3)) who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery between January 1, 2006, and June 6, 2012, were included in the study. Clinical presentation, radiological studies, laboratory investigations, tumor pathology data, clinical outcomes, extent of resection measured by volumetric analysis, and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative tumor diameter in this series was 4.1 cm and the volume was 18 cm(3). The average resection rate was 82.9%, corresponding with a mean residual volume of 3 cm(3). Gross-total resection was achieved in 16 patients (24%), near-total in 11 (17%), subtotal in 24 (36%), and partial in 15 (23%). Seventy-three percent of patients experienced improvement in visual acuity, while 24% were unchanged. Visual fields were improved in 61.8% and unchanged in 5.5%. Overall, 27 patients (37%) experienced a total of 32 complications. The most common complications were sinusitis (14%) and CSF leak (10%). Six patients underwent subsequent radiation therapy because of aggressive tumor histopathology. No deaths occurred in this cohort of patients. Statistically significant predictors of extent of resection included highest Knosp grade (p = 0.001), preoperative tumor volume (p = 0.025), preoperative maximum tumor diameter (p = 0.002), hemorrhagic component (p = 0.027), posterior extension (p = 0.001), and sphenoid sinus invasion (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery is an effective treatment method for patients with large and giant pituitary adenomas, which results in high (> 80%) rates of resection and improvement in visual function. It is not associated with high rates of major complications and is safe when performed by experienced surgeons. The preoperative Knosp grade, tumor volume, tumor diameter, hemorrhagic components on MRI, posterior extension, and sphenoid sinus invasion may allow a prediction of extent of resection and in these patients a staged operation may be required to maximize extent of resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF leak; FGFR4 = fibroblast growth factor receptor–4; GTR = gross-total resection; ICA = internal carotid artery; Knosp grade; SIADH = syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion; cavernous sinus; endoscopic; pituitary surgery; sellar

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785323     DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  49 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on rhino-neurosurgery.

Authors:  Werner Hosemann; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 2.  Gross total resection of pituitary adenomas after endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reem D Almutairi; Ivo S Muskens; David J Cote; Mark D Dijkman; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Erin Crocker; Kholoud Ghazawi; Marike L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan A Zaidi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting tumor consistency and extent of resection in patients with pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Wei Ding; Zheng Huang; Gaofeng Zhou; Lang Li; Mingyu Zhang; Zhenyan Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Double sellar floor sign: a clue of pituitary tumor.

Authors:  Yu-Chieh Yang; Chih-Chien Sung
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Mahmoud Messerer; Giulia Cossu; Mercy George; Roy Thomas Daniel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Predicting early post-operative remission in pituitary adenomas: evaluation of the modified knosp classification.

Authors:  Marie Buchy; Véronique Lapras; Muriel Rabilloud; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Gérald Raverot
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Role of High-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI with Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel Reconstruction to Identify the Normal Pituitary Gland in Patients with Macroadenomas.

Authors:  R Sen; C Sen; J Pack; K T Block; J G Golfinos; V Prabhu; F Boada; O Gonen; D Kondziolka; G Fatterpekar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Extent of Endoscopic Resection for Anterior Skull Base Tumors: An MRI-Based Volumetric Analysis.

Authors:  Ian J Koszewski; Gregory Avey; Azam Ahmed; Lucas Leonhard; Matthew R Hoffman; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 9.  Giant pituitary adenoma: histological types, clinical features and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Pedro Iglesias; Víctor Rodríguez Berrocal; Juan José Díez
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Pilot Study on Early Postoperative Discharge in Pituitary Adenoma Patients: Effect of Socioeconomic Factors and Benefit of Specialized Pituitary Centers.

Authors:  Christopher A Sarkiss; James Lee; Joseph A Papin; Eliza B Geer; Rudrani Banik; Janet C Rucker; Barbara Oudheusden; Satish Govindaraj; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.