Literature DB >> 24785078

Is the voter model a model for voters?

Juan Fernández-Gracia1, Krzysztof Suchecki2, José J Ramasco1, Maxi San Miguel1, Víctor M Eguíluz1.   

Abstract

The voter model has been studied extensively as a paradigmatic opinion dynamics model. However, its ability to model real opinion dynamics has not been addressed. We introduce a noisy voter model (accounting for social influence) with recurrent mobility of agents (as a proxy for social context), where the spatial and population diversity are taken as inputs to the model. We show that the dynamics can be described as a noisy diffusive process that contains the proper anisotropic coupling topology given by population and mobility heterogeneity. The model captures statistical features of U.S. presidential elections as the stationary vote-share fluctuations across counties and the long-range spatial correlations that decay logarithmically with the distance. Furthermore, it recovers the behavior of these properties when the geographical space is coarse grained at different scales-from the county level through congressional districts, and up to states. Finally, we analyze the role of the mobility range and the randomness in decision making, which are consistent with the empirical observations.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785078     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.158701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  17 in total

1.  Transitivity reinforcement in the coevolving voter model.

Authors:  Nishant Malik; Feng Shi; Hsuan-Wei Lee; Peter J Mucha
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Heterogeneity in evolutionary games: an analysis of the risk perception.

Authors:  Marco A Amaral; Marco A Javarone
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Cell fate reprogramming by control of intracellular network dynamics.

Authors:  Jorge G T Zañudo; Réka Albert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Competing opinion diffusion on social networks.

Authors:  Haibo Hu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Large order fluctuations, switching, and control in complex networks.

Authors:  Jason Hindes; Ira B Schwartz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Voting contagion: Modeling and analysis of a century of U.S. presidential elections.

Authors:  Dan Braha; Marcus A M de Aguiar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A networked voting rule for democratic representation.

Authors:  Alexis R Hernández; Carlos Gracia-Lázaro; Edgardo Brigatti; Yamir Moreno
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Stylized Facts in Brazilian Vote Distributions.

Authors:  Angelo Mondaini Calvão; Nuno Crokidakis; Celia Anteneodo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The noisy voter model on complex networks.

Authors:  Adrián Carro; Raúl Toral; Maxi San Miguel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Staged Models for Interdisciplinary Research.

Authors:  Luis F Lafuerza; Louise Dyson; Bruce Edmonds; Alan J McKane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.