Literature DB >> 24784925

Influence of weight and structure on biological behavior of polypropylene mesh prostheses placed at the esophageal hiatus.

Jonas Senft1, Tobias Gehrig, Felix Lasitschka, Georg R Linke, Maxym Shevchenko, Thomas Bruckner, Hannes G Kenngott, Lars Fischer, Beat P Müller-Stich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental knowledge about mesh behavior at the esophageal hiatus is rare, but such information is essential in order to find a safe and effective method of mesh reinforcement. This study aimed to investigate the influence of mesh structure on the biological behavior of polypropylene prostheses placed at the hiatus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four pigs in three groups of eight underwent implantation of heavyweight small-porous (HW-SP), heavyweight large-porous (HW-LP), or lightweight large-porous (LW-LP) circular polypropylene mesh at the hiatus. Eight weeks later, the meshes were explanted. Macroscopic analysis was performed evaluating mesh deformation, adhesions, and position relative to the hiatal margin. Histological analysis comprised evaluation of foreign body reaction and tissue integration by mononuclear cell count and immunostaining of Ki-67, collagen type I, and collagen type III.
RESULTS: No mesh-related complications occurred. Mesh shrinkage was observed within all groups and was the lowest for HW-LP, higher for HW-SP, and highest for LW-LP (13.8% versus 19.5% versus 25.5%; P<.001). The adhesion score was highest for HW-SP, lower for HW-LP, and lowest for LW-LP (11.0 versus 8.0 versus 6.0; P<.001). The collagen type I/III ratio was higher for HW-SP compared with HW-LP and LW-LP (3.1 versus 2.2 versus 1.8; P=.014).
CONCLUSIONS: Heavyweight polypropylene meshes may be advantageous for application at the hiatus. They provide a solid fixation of the esophagogastric junction by adhesions, which may contribute to a reduction of hernia recurrence. In heavyweight meshes, the large-porous structure is associated with superior form stability, and small-porous meshes are superior with regard to solidity of tissue integration, which may prevent mesh migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24784925     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  2 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic augmentation of the diaphragmatic hiatus with biologic mesh versus suture repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Beat P Müller-Stich; George A Antoniou; Gernot Köhler; Ruzica-Rosalia Luketina; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank-Alexander Granderath
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Beat P Müller-Stich; Hannes G Kenngott; Matthias Gondan; Christian Stock; Georg R Linke; Franziska Fritz; Felix Nickel; Markus K Diener; Carsten N Gutt; Moritz Wente; Markus W Büchler; Lars Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.