Literature DB >> 24784714

First-trimester maternal serum C-reactive protein as a predictor of third-trimester impaired glucose tolerance.

Erica K Berggren1, Hilary A Roeder2, Kim A Boggess3, Kevin Moss4, Steven Offenbacher4, Emilia Campbell5, Chad A Grotegut5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether first-trimester high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a suggested marker of pregnancy-associated hyperglycemia, predicts third-trimester impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of nondiabetic singletons enrolled at <26 weeks gestation. STUDY
DESIGN: We measured the association between hsCRP collected at <14 weeks among women classified as IGT (gestational diabetes screening results, 135 to <200 mg/dL) and those among normoglycemic women. Multivariable modeling estimated the association between log hsCRP and IGT, adjusted for maternal body mass index (BMI).
RESULTS: Among 300 women, 13% (39 of 300) had IGT. The hsCRP was positively associated with glucose (P = .005). Compared with normoglycemic women, women with IGT had higher log hsCRP (0.87 ± 0.66 vs 0.67 ± 0.60, P = .04), but the association was not significant in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 0.65-2.21). The hsCRP did not predict third-trimester IGT in this analysis when BMI is considered.
CONCLUSION: Early identification of women at risk of IGT remains a priority, but the contribution of maternal BMI appears greater than hsCRP.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early pregnancy predictors; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; impaired glucose tolerance; maternal serum markers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24784714      PMCID: PMC4527417          DOI: 10.1177/1933719114532843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of C-reactive protein for cardiovascular disease detection and prevention.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The oral conditions and pregnancy study: periodontal status of a cohort of pregnant women.

Authors:  Susan Lieff; Kim A Boggess; Amy P Murtha; Heather Jared; Phoebus N Madianos; Kevin Moss; James Beck; Steven Offenbacher
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 3.  Biomarkers for diabetes prediction, pathogenesis or pharmacotherapy guidance? Past, present and future possibilities.

Authors:  N Sattar
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  M Visser; L M Bouter; G M McQuillan; M H Wener; T B Harris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Maternal serum C-reactive protein concentration early in pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Kim A Boggess; Susan Lieff; Amy P Murtha; Kevin Moss; Heather Jared; James Beck; Steven Offenbacher
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Long-term outcomes in mothers diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus and their offspring.

Authors:  Boyd E Metzger
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Gestational diabetes: the consequences of not treating.

Authors:  Oded Langer; Yariv Yogev; Orli Most; Elly M J Xenakis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Predicting gestational diabetes: choosing the optimal early serum marker.

Authors:  Karen V Smirnakis; Alicia Plati; Myles Wolf; Ravi Thadhani; Jeffrey L Ecker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  C-reactive protein and gestational diabetes: the central role of maternal obesity.

Authors:  Ravi Retnakaran; Anthony J G Hanley; Nuryt Raif; Philip W Connelly; Mathew Sermer; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  John P Bantle; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Ann L Albright; Caroline M Apovian; Nathaniel G Clark; Marion J Franz; Byron J Hoogwerf; Alice H Lichtenstein; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis; Arshag D Mooradian; Madelyn L Wheeler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk prediction model of gestational diabetes mellitus based on nomogram in a Chinese population cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhang; Xin Zhao; Lili Huo; Ning Yuan; Jianbin Sun; Jing Du; Min Nan; Linong Ji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Deep Insight of the Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Amarish Kumar Sharma; Sanjeev Singh; Himanshu Singh; Deviyani Mahajan; Prachetha Kolli; Gowtham Mandadapu; Bimlesh Kumar; Dharmendra Kumar; Sudarshan Kumar; Manoj Kumar Jena
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  The potential role of biomarkers in predicting gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Huguette S Brink; Aart Jan van der Lely; Joke van der Linden
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.335

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.