Literature DB >> 24784207

Publishing: Rise in retractions is a signal of integrity.

Daniele Fanelli1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24784207     DOI: 10.1038/509033a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Retractions: A clean slate.

Authors:  Virginia Gewin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 3.  How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Elizabeth Wager; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2015-07

2.  Ten Simple Rules for Protecting Research Integrity.

Authors:  David M Shaw; Thomas C Erren
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  The application of the retraction watch database in eye research-based studies.

Authors:  Andrew T Barton; Miguel Cordero-Coma; Micheal J Gallagher; Taygan Yilmaz
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013).

Authors:  Michèle B Nuijten; Chris H J Hartgerink; Marcel A L M van Assen; Sacha Epskamp; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.