Literature DB >> 24783092

Piriformis fossa - an anatomical and orthopedics consideration.

O P Lakhwani1, P S Mittal2, D C Naik3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Piriformis fossa is an important anatomical landmark having significant clinical value in orthopedic surgery; but its location and anatomical relationship with surrounding structures are not clearly defined. Hence it is necessary to clearly describe it in respect to anatomical and orthopedic aspect.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty Cadaveric dry femoral bones and Dissection of the four hip specimens were used to study the Piriformis fossa in respect to location and its relationship with surrounding structures. Clinical importance of piriformis fossa was determined in reference to antegrade femoral nail insertion. OBSERVATIONS: Piriformis muscle and so called piriformis fossa are unrelated entities. Piriformis fossa is anatomical site of insertion of obturator externus. In dry cadaveric femora; fossa was not always located in the direction of femoral shaft. It was located in the direction of femoral shaft in 24% cases only. In 68% cases femoral canal was aligned lateral and in 8% cases, it lies medial to the fossa.
CONCLUSION: Piriformis fossa should be named as Trorchanteric fossa or Obturator fossa for better anatomical description. So called Piriformis fossa does not found to be universally corresponding to femoral shaft hence selection of entry site should be based on variable proximal femur and area on femur which corresponds to femoral shaft.

Keywords:  Femoral nail; Piriformis fossa; Piriformis muscle; Trochanteric fossa

Year:  2014        PMID: 24783092      PMCID: PMC4003698          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6905.4118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  9 in total

1.  Anatomy of piriformis, obturator internus and obturator externus: implications for the posterior surgical approach to the hip.

Authors:  L B Solomon; Y C Lee; S A Callary; M Beck; D W Howie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

2.  Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing. Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Wolfgang Grechenig; Wolfgang Pichler; Hans Clement; Norbert Peter Tesch; Stephan Grechenig
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  William M Ricci; John Schwappach; Michael Tucker; Kevin Coupe; Angel Brandt; Roy Sanders; Ross Leighton
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing.

Authors:  Robert F Ostrum; Andrew Marcantonio; Robert Marburger
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 5.  Piriform and trochanteric fossae. A drawing mismatch or a terminology error? A review.

Authors:  Stamatios A Papadakis; Lane Shepherd; Eleni C Babourda; Stefanos Papadakis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases.

Authors:  R A Winquist; S T Hansen; D K Clawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur.

Authors:  I Kempf; A Grosse; G Beck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point.

Authors:  T Gausepohl; D Pennig; J Koebke; S Harnoss
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Correlation of trochanter-shaft angle in selection of entry site in antegrade intramedullary femoral nail.

Authors:  O P Lakhwani
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2012-05-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.