| Literature DB >> 24782666 |
Wenxiu Wang1, Yaoqiu Kuang2, Ningsheng Huang2, Daiqing Zhao3.
Abstract
The decoupling elasticity decomposition quantitative model of energy-related carbon emission in Guangdong is established based on the extended Kaya identity and Tapio decoupling model for the first time, to explore the decoupling relationship and its internal mechanism between energy-related carbon emission and economic growth in Guangdong. Main results are as follows. (1) Total production energy-related carbon emissions in Guangdong increase from 4128 × 10⁴ tC in 1995 to 14396 × 10⁴ tC in 2011. Decoupling elasticity values of energy-related carbon emission and economic growth increase from 0.53 in 1996 to 0.85 in 2011, and its decoupling state turns from weak decoupling in 1996-2004 to expansive coupling in 2005-2011. (2) Land economic output and energy intensity are the first inhibiting factor and the first promoting factor to energy-related carbon emission decoupling from economic growth, respectively. The development speeds of land urbanization and population urbanization, especially land urbanization, play decisive roles in the change of total decoupling elasticity values. (3) Guangdong can realize decoupling of energy-related carbon emission from economic growth effectively by adjusting the energy mix and industrial structure, coordinating the development speed of land urbanization and population urbanization effectively, and strengthening the construction of carbon sink.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24782666 PMCID: PMC3981526 DOI: 10.1155/2014/782750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Geographic location of Guangdong in China.
Carbon emission coefficients of different kinds of energy.
| Energy type | Net calorific value | Carbon content | Carbon emission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw coal | 20.7 | 26.6 | 0.55 |
| Washed clean coal | 28.2 | 25.8 | 0.73 |
| Other types of washed coal | 28.2 | 25.8 | 0.73 |
| Briquettes | 20.7 | 26.6 | 0.55 |
| Coke | 28.2 | 29.2 | 0.82 |
| Coke-oven gas | 0.20 | ||
| Other gases | 0.20 | ||
| Other coking products | 28.2 | 0.82 | |
| Natural gas | 0.44 | ||
| Crude oil | 42.3 | 20.0 | 0.85 |
| Gasoline | 44.3 | 18.9 | 0.84 |
| Kerosene | 43.8 | 19.6 | 0.86 |
| Diesel oil | 43.0 | 20.2 | 0.87 |
| Fuel oil | 40.4 | 21.1 | 0.85 |
| Liquefied petroleum gas | 47.3 | 17.2 | 0.81 |
| Refinery gas | 49.5 | 15.7 | 0.78 |
| Other petroleum products | 40.2 | 20.0 | 0.80 |
Notes: (1) The unit of carbon emission coefficients of “Coke-oven gas,” “other gases,” and “natural gas” is “ton carbon/ton standard coal equivalent” or “tC/tsce.” Carbon emission coefficient of natural gas comes from reference [35] and carbon emission coefficients of “coke-oven gas” and “other gases” are calculated according to the relationship between their calorific value and natural gas. (2) The unit of other energy's carbon emission coefficient is “ton C/ton” or “tC/t.” It represents carbon emission from one tone physical quantity energy. Carbon emission coefficient = net calorific value × carbon content, net calorific value, and carbon content come from 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [36]. Carbon content per unit coal is higher than oil, but its net calorific value is lower than that of oil, resulting in the carbon emission coefficient of coal being lower than for oil. We reference here the paper [37].
Eight decoupling states divided by Tapio (2005) [15].
| Decoupling elasticity values ( | Δ | ΔGDP/GDP | Decoupling states |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| <0 | >0 | Strong decoupling |
| 0 ≤ | >0 | >0 | Weak decoupling |
| 0.8 ≤ | >0 | >0 | Expansive coupling |
|
| >0 | >0 | Expansive negative decoupling |
|
| >0 | <0 | Strong negative decoupling |
| 0 ≤ | <0 | <0 | Weak negative decoupling |
| 0.8 ≤ | <0 | <0 | Recessive coupling |
|
| <0 | <0 | Recessive decoupling |
Figure 2Change trends of energy-related carbon emission from 1995 to 2011.
Figure 5Change trends of each of decoupling elasticity values between energy-related carbon emission and economic growth from 1996 to 2011.
Figure 3Energy mix and decoupling elasticity values of energy mix from 1995 to 2011.
Figure 4Industrial structure and decoupling elasticity values of industrial structure from 1995 to 2011.
Figure 6Change trends of urbanization in Guangdong from 1995 to 2011.
(a)
| Energy mix | Energy intensity | Industrial structure | Land economic output | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | State of | Value | State of | Value | State of decoupling | Value | State of | |
| 1996 | −0.03 | SD | −0.40 | SD | −0.07 | SD | 1.03 | EC |
| 1997 | −0.03 | SD | −0.53 | SD | −0.10 | SD | 1.07 | EC |
| 1998 | −0.04 | SD | −0.52 | SD | −0.07 | SD | 1.09 | EC |
| 1999 | −0.05 | SD | −0.46 | SD | −0.07 | SD | 1.11 | EC |
| 2000 | −0.02 | SD | −0.47 | SD | −0.08 | SD | 1.11 | EC |
| 2001 | −0.02 | SD | −0.46 | SD | −0.10 | SD | 1.13 | EC |
| 2002 | −0.02 | SD | −0.42 | SD | −0.09 | SD | 1.14 | EC |
| 2003 | −0.01 | SD | −0.39 | SD | −0.02 | SD | 1.14 | EC |
| 2004 | −0.02 | SD | −0.37 | SD | 0.01 | WD | 1.14 | EC |
| 2005 | −0.01 | SD | −0.34 | SD | 0.03 | WD | 1.13 | EC |
| 2006 | −0.01 | SD | −0.34 | SD | 0.03 | WD | 1.14 | EC |
| 2007 | 0.00 | WD | −0.33 | SD | 0.02 | WD | 1.14 | EC |
| 2008 | 0.01 | WD | −0.37 | SD | 0.02 | WD | 1.16 | EC |
| 2009 | 0.02 | WD | −0.36 | SD | 0.01 | WD | 1.16 | EC |
| 2010 | 0.04 | WD | −0.42 | SD | 0.02 | WD | 1.18 | EC |
| 2011 | 0.04 | WD | −0.37 | SD | 0.01 | WD | 1.17 | EC |
(b)
| Land urbanization |
Urban area of |
Population | Population size |
Total decoupling | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | State of | Value | State of | Value | State of | Value | State of | Value | State of | |
| 1996 | 0.14 | WD | −0.20 | SD | 0.19 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.53 | WD |
| 1997 | 0.16 | WD | −0.17 | SD | 0.17 | WD | 0.16 | WD | 0.41 | WD |
| 1998 | 0.11 | WD | −0.19 | SD | 0.14 | WD | 0.16 | WD | 0.47 | WD |
| 1999 | 0.17 | WD | −0.13 | SD | 0.11 | WD | 0.19 | WD | 0.52 | WD |
| 2000 | 0.29 | WD | 0.01 | WD | 0.09 | WD | 0.22 | WD | 0.56 | WD |
| 2001 | 0.50 | WD | 0.22 | WD | 0.10 | WD | 0.20 | WD | 0.58 | WD |
| 2002 | 0.55 | WD | 0.09 | WD | 0.30 | WD | 0.19 | WD | 0.63 | WD |
| 2003 | 0.66 | WD | −0.11 | SD | 0.61 | WD | 0.17 | WD | 0.73 | WD |
| 2004 | 0.86 | EC | 0.17 | WD | 0.55 | WD | 0.16 | WD | 0.77 | WD |
| 2005 | 0.85 | EC | 0.16 | WD | 0.54 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.82 | EC |
| 2006 | 0.78 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.48 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.83 | EC |
| 2007 | 0.78 | WD | 0.20 | WD | 0.44 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.84 | EC |
| 2008 | 0.76 | WD | 0.19 | WD | 0.42 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.83 | EC |
| 2009 | 0.76 | WD | 0.22 | WD | 0.40 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.83 | EC |
| 2010 | 0.75 | WD | 0.22 | WD | 0.38 | WD | 0.16 | WD | 0.83 | EC |
| 2011 | 0.73 | WD | 0.23 | WD | 0.36 | WD | 0.15 | WD | 0.85 | EC |
Notes: SD represents strong decoupling; WD represents weak decoupling; EC represents expansive coupling.